Network for Transdisciplinary Research td-net

Our contribution to address complex societal challenges: We link scientific communities, support transdisciplinary careers and promote the development of competencies and methods. More

  • News
  • Community
  • Publications by the community

Publications by the community

On this page you find publications from our community, all around the topic of transdisciplinarity. You are warmly invited to send your own publications via E-Mail to tdnet-contributions@scnat.ch.

New in March

Publications 2014-2025

  • Aguilar-Gordón, F. del R., Collado Ruano, J., Touriñán-López, J. M., Bolaños-Vivas, R. F., Moreno-Guaicha, J. A., Estrada-García, A., Marcelín-Alvarado, M. A., Galeffi, D. A., Pasquier, F., Aguilar-Forero, N., Álvarez-Monsalve, E., Mena-Zamora, A. A., Llerena-Companioni, O., Barzaga- Sablón, O. S., Zita Zambrano, G., Vaca-Cárdenas, E., Cruz-Álvarez, Y. B., Tubay-Zambrano, F., Urbina Velasco, C. J., … Silva-Amino, C. (2023). Formación docente desde la filosofía educativa transdisciplinaria. http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/24327

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. (2024). Tour d’Horizon 2023.

  • Alexander, K. P., & Radermecker, A.-S. (2023). Towards Transdisciplinarity: Current and Future Perspectives on Art Markets Studies / Auf dem Weg zur Transdisziplinarität: Aktuelle und zukünftige Perspektiven auf die Kunstmarktf. https://doi.org/10.11588/sediment.2023.32.94784

  • Alves, G., Trujillo, J., & Dias, M. (2023). algo+ritmo: Reflexões sobre ensino, pesquisa e extensão em arquitetura e urbanismo. ProBooks.

  • Archibald, M. M., Lawless, M. T., de Plaza, M. A. P., & Kitson, A. L. (2023). How transdisciplinary research teams learn to do knowledge translation (KT), and how KT in turn impacts transdisciplinary research: A realist evaluation and longitudinal case study. Health Research Policy and Systems, 21(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-023-00967-x

  • Arnold, M. (2023). Introduction: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Social Work Management Education in Higher Education. Handbook of Applied Teaching and Learning in Social Work Management Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18038-5_1

  • Arpin, I., Likhacheva, K., & Bretagnolle, V. (2023). Organising inter- and transdisciplinary research in practice. The case of the meta-organisation French LTSER platforms. Environmental Science & Policy, 144, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2023.03.009

  • Aruna Padmanabhan, M., & Winarto, Y. T. (2023). Knowledge in the making: Embodying transdisciplinary moments on organic agriculture in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-uni-passau/frontdoor/index/index/docId/1266

  • Baker, V., Ataria, J., Ankeny, R., & Bray, H. (2023). Transdisciplinary science and the importance of Indigenous knowledge. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/IEAM.4847

  • Barth, M., Jiménez-Aceituno, A., Lam, D. P., Bürgener, L., & Lang, D. J. (2023). Transdisciplinary learning as a key leverage for sustainability transformations. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSUST.2023.101361

  • Berlowitz, I., García Torres, E., Maake, C., Wolf, U., & Martin-Soelch, C. (2023). Indigenous-Amazonian Traditional Medicine’s Usage of the Tobacco Plant: A Transdisciplinary Ethnopsychological Mixed-Methods Case Study. Plants 2023, Vol. 12, Page 346, 12(2), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS12020346

  • Bernert, P., Wahl, D., von Wehrden, H., & Lang, D. J. (2023). Cross-case knowledge transfer in transformative research: Enabling learning in and across sustainability-oriented labs through case reporting. Urban Transformations 2023 5:1, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/S42854-023-00056-W

  • Bird, S., Hosseini, M., & Plemmons, D. K. (2023). Authors Without Borders. https://online.fliphtml5.com/oaiev/cipo/

  • Boutet, D. (2023). L’intelligence de l’art. https://www.puq.ca/catalogue/livres/intelligence-art-4224.html

  • Cabrera, D., Cabrera, L. L., & Midgley, G. (2023). The Four Waves of Systems Thinking. Journal of Systems Thinking, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.54120/jost.000051

  • Caniglia, G., & Vogel, C. (2023). On being oriented Strengthening transgressive orientations in transdisciplinary sustainability research through queer theory. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.15

  • Carusi, A., Clerbaux, L.-A., & Wittwehr, C. (2023). How to Catalyze a Collaboration.

  • Chira, V. (2023). Metaphysics of cosmological models.

  • Claus, R., Davel, R., Heykoop, C., Pinto, D., & Belcher, B. M. (2023). How to build Theories of Change for transdisciplinary research: Guidance and considerations. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 186–196. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.18

  • Córdoba-Pachón, J. R. (2023). Ritual and systems thinking: Managing an initial encounter. Ritual and Systems Thinking: Managing an Initial Encounter, 1–111. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003413462

  • Craike, M., Klepac, B., Mowle, A., & Riley, T. (2023). Theory of systems change: An initial, middle-range theory of public health research impact. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/RESEVAL/RVAD030

  • DA SILVA GUIMARÃES MARTINS DA COSTA, L. (2023). The Mediating Manager for Effective Troubleshooting in Organizations: A Transdisciplinary View from HPTD-M. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.22545/2023/00228

  • Danielle Boutet. (2023). L’intelligence de l?art.

  • Darbellay, F. (2023). Interdisciplinarity, Team Science, and the Next Generation of Researchers: The Children’s Drawings of Gods Project Experience. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, 12, 489–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94429-2_19/FIGURES/2

  • Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Intelligence, and Collaboration in 21st Century Education: An Interdisciplinary Challenge. 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/BOOKS978-3-0365-9472-9

  • de Geus, T., Avelino, F., Strumińska-Kutra, M., Pitzer, M., Wittmayer, J. M., Hendrikx, L., Joshi, V., Schrandt, N., Widdel, L., Fraaije, M., Iskandarova, M., Hielscher, S., & Rogge, K. (2023). Making sense of power through transdisciplinary sustainability research: Insights from a Transformative Power Lab. Sustainability Science, 18(3), 1311–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01294-4

  • Deibl, I., Tulis, M., & Warto, P. (2023). Bd. 18 Nr. 4 (2023): Nachhaltige Lehre – Nachhaltige Bildungsinstitution Hochschule | Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung. https://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/issue/view/83

  • Deutsch, S., Keller, R., Krug, C. B., & Michel, A. H. (2023). Transdisciplinary transformative change: An analysis of some best practices and barriers, and the potential of critical social science in getting us there. Biodiversity and Conservation. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10531-023-02576-0

  • Djinlev, V., Dallo, I., Müller, S. M., Surchat, M., von Rothkirch, J., Wenger, A., & Späth, L. (2023). Challenges and strategies in transdisciplinary research ‐ early career researchers’ perspectives. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.16

  • Donnelly, G., & Montuori, A. (2023). Routledge handbook for creative futures. https://www.routledge.com/Routledge-Handbook-for-Creative-Futures/Donnelly-Montuori/p/book/9780367897185

  • Durán, A. P., Kuiper, J. J., Aguiar, A. P. D., Cheung, W. W. L., Diaw, M. C., Halouani, G., Hashimoto, S., Gasalla, M. A., Peterson, G. D., Schoolenberg, M. A., Abbasov, R., Acosta, L. A., Armenteras, D., Davila, F., Denboba, M. A., Harrison, P. A., Harhash, K. A., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Kim, H. J., … Pereira, L. M. (2023). Bringing the Nature Futures Framework to life: Creating a set of illustrative narratives of nature futures. Sustainability Science, 20, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-023-01316-1/FIGURES/3

  • European University of the Seas. (2023). Involving Stakeholders—A good practice guide for Transdisciplinarity.

  • Formación docente desde la filosofía educativa transdisciplinaria. (2023).

  • Frayssinhes, J. (n.d.). LHUMAINE N° 2 | 2023 Langage et pensée complexe: Le cas de la transdisciplinarité Sous titre par défaut. https://lhumaine.numerev.com/articles/revue-2/2954-langage-et-pensee-complexe-le-cas-de-la-transdiscip

  • Frayssinhes, J. (2023). Philosophie et Transdisciplinarite: Le Cas de la Crise du Covid-19.

  • Fritz, L., Hansmann, R., Dalimier, B., & Binder, C. R. (2023). Perceived impacts of the Fridays for Future climate movement on environmental concern and behaviour in Switzerland. Sustainability Science, 1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-023-01348-7/TABLES/7

  • Gajary, L. C., Misra, S., Desai, A., Evasius, D. M., Frechtling, J., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J. D., Silverstein, G., & Wells, J. (2023). Convergence Research as a ‘System-of-Systems’: A Framework and Research Agenda. Minerva, 62(2), 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09503-1

  • Gasparatos, A., Rigolot, C., & Pereira, L. M. (2023). Editorial: Transdisciplinary research for understanding and transforming food systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1296257. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSUFS.2023.1296257

  • Ghirardello, L., & Isetti, G. (2023). Is tragedy the true language of science? Unleashing the emotional power of theatrical storytelling for climate change communication. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(3), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.3.6

  • Gluckman, P., & Kaiser, M. (2023). Looking at the Future of Transdisciplinary Research. Centre for Science Futures. https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.05

  • Gotsche, C. I., Weishaar, H., & Hanefeld, J. (2023). Global health in Germany: Understanding interdisciplinarity in the academic sector. Health Policy, 130, 104715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104715

  • Graf, A., Loges, B., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2023). Inter- und Transdisziplinarität als normative Dynamik: Herausforderungen und Chancen für die Politikwissenschaft. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 64(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00453-7

  • Hack, J., Perez Rubi, M., Beissler, M., Ortega Sandoval, A., & Bonilla, J. R. (2023). Implementing Nature-based Solutions and Green Infrastructure for Cities, Citizens and Rivers—The SEE-URBAN-WATER Project. Hannover : Institutionelles Repositorium der Leibniz Universität Hannover. https://doi.org/10.15488/15438

  • Hahn, A., Kirschke, S., Caucci, S., Müller, A., Benavides, L., & Avellán, T. (2023). Perceptions of transdisciplinary research – A comparative case study from Latin America. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100207

  • Hedtke, R. (2023). Sozioökonomische Bildung – ein Exempel für das Verhältnis von Disziplinarität und Transdisziplinarität. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/2981272

  • Hennen, L., Hahn, J., Ladikas, M., Lindner, R., Peissl, W., & van Est, R. (2023). Technology Assessment in a Globalized World: Facing the Challenges of Transnational Technology Governance. Technology Assessment in a Globalized World: Facing the Challenges of Transnational Technology Governance, 1–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10617-0/COVER

  • Hesjedal, M. B., & Åm, H. (2023). Making sense of transdisciplinarity: Interpreting science policy in a biotechnology centre. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/SCIPOL/SCAC055

  • Hofmann, B. (2023). Persuasive innovators for environmental policy: Green business influence through technology-based arguing. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.2178515

  • Hofmann, B., Ingold, K., Stamm, C., Ammann, P., Eggen, R. I. L., Finger, R., Fuhrimann, S., Lienert, J., Mark, J., McCallum, C., Probst-Hensch, N., Reber, U., Tamm, L., Wiget, M., Winkler, M. S., Zachmann, L., & Hoffmann, S. (2023). Barriers to evidence use for sustainability: Insights from pesticide policy and practice. Ambio, 52(2), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01790-4

  • Horn, A., Scheffelaar, A., Urias, E., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2023). Training students for complex sustainability issues: A literature review on the design of inter- and transdisciplinary higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2021-0111/FULL/XML

  • Horn, A., Urias, · Eduardo, Klein, J. T., Hess, A., Marjolein, ·, & Zweekhorst, B. M. (2023). Expert and non-expert at the same time: Knowledge integration processes and dynamics in interdisciplinary teamwork. Sustainability Science, 18, 2357–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01365-6

  • International Science Council. (2023). LIRA 2030 Africa: Learning from Practising Transdisciplinary Research for Sustainable Development in African Cities. International Science Council. https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.02

  • International Science Council/Network of African Science Academies. (2023). LIRA 2030 Africa: Key achievements and learnings (2016-2021). International Science Council. https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.04

  • Karrer, L., Steinböck, C., Julia Trechsel, L., da Silva, T., & Breu, T. (2023). IGS North-South Tracer Study 2022: Decolonizing a PhD Programme and Beyond. https://doi.org/10.48350/182165

  • Kastenhofer, K., Friesacher, H. R., Reich, A., & Capari, L. (2023). (Re-)connecting academia during a sudden, global crisis. Zeitschrift Fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie Und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 32(2), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.14512/TATUP.32.2.17

  • Kellner, E. (2023). Identifying leverage points for shifting Water-Energy-Food nexus cases towards sustainability through the Networks of Action Situations approach combined with systems thinking. Sustainability Science, 18(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01170-7

  • Klein, J. T. (2023). Advancing transdisciplinarity: Learning, teaching, and institutionalizing. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.14

  • Kligyte, G., Bowdler, B., Baumber, A., Pratt, S., Allen, L., Buck, A., Le Hunte, B., Melvold, J., & Key, T. (2023). Work-integrated professional learning: Shifting paradigms through transdisciplinary engagement. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/0158037X.2023.2224238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2023.2224238

  • Kliskey, A. “Anaru”, Williams, P., Trammell, E. J., Cronan, D., Griffith, D., Alessa, L., Lammers, R., Haro-Martí, M. E. de, & Oxarango-Ingram, J. (2023). Building trust, building futures: Knowledge co-production as relationship, design, and process in transdisciplinary science. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENVS.2023.1007105/PDF

  • Küffer, C. (2023). Naturschutz für alle: Neue Akteursgruppen für die Biodiversität in der Schweiz. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8268854

  • Laksmana, D. D. (2023). Knowledge in the making: Embodying transdisciplinar moments on organic agriculture in Yogyakarta, Indonesiua.

  • Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., & Anderson, K. J. (2023). Pathway profiles: Learning from five main approaches to assessing interdisciplinarity. Research Evaluation, 32(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac036

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2023a). Community and Privacy in a Hyper‐Connected World. Urban Planning, 8(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v8i3.7189

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2023b). Oecumene: Repositioning Ourselves in Our Habitat. World, 4(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4010007

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2023c). Promoting and Sustaining Urban Health: Challenges and Responses. Sustainability, 15(17), 12837. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU151712837

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2023d). Transdisciplinarity: Science for the public good. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1519(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14940

  • Lewis, A. L., Julia TRECHSEL, L., Barbara ZIMMERMANN, A., Lena Lewis, A., Julia Trechsel, L., & Barbara Zimmermann, A. (2023). Monitoring the integration of Sustainable Development into higher education teaching: A collaborative learning approach. Zeitschrift Für Hochschulentwicklung, 18(4), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.21240/zfhe/18-04/04

  • Lieu, J., Martínez-Reyes, A., Groome, P., Mangalagiu, D., Pearce, B. B. J., Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., & Møller, R. E. D. (2023). Inclusive stakeholder engagement for equitable knowledge co-production: Insights from the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme in climate change research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.11

  • LIRA 2030 Africa: Key achievements and learnings (2016-2021). (2023). https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.04

  • LIRA 2030 Africa: Learning from Practising Transdisciplinary Research for Sustainable Development in African Cities. (2023). https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.02

  • Logere, R., Mannell, K., Davis, J., Roberts, P., Amery, P., Bennett, S., Day, N., Kervin, L., Mascheroni, G., Mackenzie, J., Sefton-Green, J., & Straker, L. (2023). Seeding transdisciplinary culture: Lessons from the Digital Child Centre transdisciplinary workshops AUTHORS. https://doi.org/10.26187/src1-nj75

  • Lopes Pinheiro, S., & Pasquier, F. (2023). Possibilidades de uma ética transdisciplinar frente as questões do Antropoceno. Revista Sergipana de Educação Ambiental, 10, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.47401/revisea.v10.17680

  • Lotrecchiano, G. R., Balog, E., Brundage, S., Deyo, P., Conlon, L., Bugin, K., Sheffey, L., Cook, E., & Gentry, M. (2023). Similarities and differences in motivation in cross-disciplinary biomedical, policy, and education health science teams: A mixed methods comparative case study using the MATRICx. Team Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-05-2022-0036

  • Madouas, M., Henaux, M., Delrieu, V., Jaugey, C., Teillet, E., Perrin, M., Schmitt, C., Oberheiden, M., Schermesser, F., Soustre-Gacougnolle, I., & Masson, J. E. (2023). Learning, reflexivity, decision-making, and behavioral change for sustainable viticulture associated with participatory action research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01690-2

  • Mandelid, M. B. (2023). Approaching physically active learning as a multi, inter, and transdisciplinary research field. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPOR.2023.1228340

  • Marg, O., & Theiler, L. (2023). Effects of transdisciplinary research on scientific knowledge and reflexivity. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/RESEVAL/RVAD033

  • Matthys, M. L., Illien, P., Acharya, S., Amacker, M., Bieri, S., Musafili, I., & Sanesathid, O. (2023). The Role of High-Value Agriculture in Capability Expansion: Qualitative Insights into Smallholder Cash Crop Production in Nepal, Laos and Rwanda. European Journal of Development Research, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41287-023-00600-1/TABLES/2

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2023a). Shifting Paradigms: Bringing Transdisciplinarity into the Light. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 14. https://doi.org/10.22545/2023/00235

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2023b). Transdisciplinarity and Public Policy: Nicolescuian, Zurich, and Brazilian Approaches. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22545/2023/00219

  • Meth, D., Scharoun, L., Crowther, P., Belek Fialho Teixeira, M., Brough, D., & Burton, L. O. (2023). Working towards Transdisciplinary Futures: Complexities and Concepts in Education. In L. Scharoun, D. Meth, P. Crowther, D. Brough, L. O. Burton, & M. Fialho Leandro Alves Teixeira (Eds.), Contemporary Design Education in Australia: Creating Transdisciplinary Futures (pp. 294–309). Intellect Ltd. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/92537

  • Meyers, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in a degrowth context: A conviviality perspective on machine learning. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 33(1), 186–192. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.1.13

  • Minna, K., Jacobi, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Lukkarinen, J. P., Ott, A., Peltomaa, J., Schneider, F., Tribaldos, T., & Zaehringer, J. G. (2023). Reflexive use of methods: A framework for navigating different types of knowledge and power in transformative research. Sustainability Science, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-023-01431-Z/TABLES/3

  • Mitchell, C. (2023). Max Neef (2005) and the great transdisciplinary swindle: Lack of originality or something more worrisome? Ecological Economics, 213, 107953. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2023.107953

  • Mitrano, D. M., Bigalke, M., Booth, A. M., Carteny, C. C., Coffin, S., Egger, M., Gondikas, A., Hüffer, T., Koelmans, A. A., Lahive, E., Mattsson, K., Reynaud, S., & Wagner, S. (2023). Training the next generation of plastics pollution researchers: Tools, skills and career perspectives in an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary field. Microplastics and Nanoplastics, 3(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-023-00072-4

  • Mokiy, V., & Lukyanova, T. (2022). Manifesto for Systems Transdisciplinarity (2023—2030).

  • Moody, Z., Berchtold-Sedooka, A., Camponovo, S., Jaffé, P. D., & Darbellay, F. (2023). School Journey as a Third Place. https://anthempress.com/school-journey-as-a-third-place-hb

  • Müller, S., Artmann, M., & Surrey, · Caroline. (2023). Opening the human spirit to sustainability transformation: The potential for individual human-nature resonance and integrative rituals. Sustainability Science, 18, 2323–2339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01360-x

  • Nuske, J. (2023). Transdisziplinäre Reallabore in der Bearbeitung gesellschaftlicher Herausforderungen: Utopie einer ko-kreativen Gesellschaftsgestaltung? Zeitschrift Für Gemeinwirtschaft Und Gemeinwohl, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2023-2

  • Pachoud, C., Bruley, E., Grosinger, J., Crépeau, A. S., Salim, E., Savre, C., & Vialette, Y. (2023). Joint problem framing: A transdisciplinary methodology for a sustainable future in mountain areas. Sustainability Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-022-01285-X/METRICS

  • Palavicino, C. A., Ejderyan, O., & Vienni-Baptista, B. (2023). Building pathways between transdisciplinarity and transformation: Lessons from practice. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.10

  • Parasitäre Paradoxa – Band 293-2023 – www.kunstforum.de. (n.d.). Retrieved 26 April 2024, from https://www.kunstforum.de/band/2023-293-parasitaere-paradoxa-kunst-zwischen-anpassung-und-widerstand/

  • Parisi, G. (2023). In a Flight of Starlings: The Wonders of Complex Systems. https://books.google.es/books?id=4-SBEAAAQBAJ

  • Pasquier, F. (2023). Un Enseignant-Chercheuer en quête de Sens et de Liberté. L’Harmattan. https://www.editions-harmattan.fr/livre-un_enseignant_chercheur_en_quete_de_sens_et_de_liberte_auto_regards_sur_son_metier_au_mitan_de_la_carriere_et_de_la_vie_gaston_pineau_florent_pasquier_jean_claude_regnier-9782140348686-78100.html

  • Pathak, G. S., Hinge, M., & Otzen, D. E. (2023). Transdisciplinary pragmatic melioration for the plastic life cycle: Why the social, natural, and technical sciences should prioritize reducing harm. Science of The Total Environment, 895, 165154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165154

  • Paulsen, T., & Kueffer, C. (2023). Two decades of transdisciplinarity in Switzerland: Past, present, future. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(4), 391–393. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.4.11

  • Paulsen, T., & Pohl, C. (2023). Building a transdisciplinary future: Balancing collaboration and excellence. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(2), 213–213. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.2.1

  • Pearce, B. J., Vienni-Baptista, B., Stauffacher, M., Paulsen, T., Krütli, P., Buser, T., Salsabila, N. P., & Christl, C. (2023). Creating spaces and cultivating mindsets for transdisciplinary learning and experimentation: Pathways beyond the International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021. GAIA  - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.1.6

  • Philipp, T., & Schmohl, T. (2023). Handbook Transdisciplinary Learning. https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-6347-1/handbook-transdisciplinary-learning/

  • Pinheiro, S. L. (2023). Autoconhecimento e transdisciplinaridade: Diálogos com Basarab Nicolescu sobre ambiente, educação e novas tecnologias. REMEA - Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, 40(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.14295/remea.v40i2.14562

  • Pinheiro, S. L., & Pasquier, F. (2023). Consciousness and Environmental Education: Transdisciplinary Urgencies from the Post-Pandemic Context. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 14, 81–94. https://doi.org/10.22545/2023/00223

  • Pinheiro, S. L. (2023). Possibilidades de uma ética transdisciplinar frente as questões do Antropoceno. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.47401/revisea.v10.17680

  • Reed, M. G., Robson, J. P., Campos Rivera, M., Chapela, F., Davidson‐Hunt, I., Friedrichsen, P., Haine, E., Johnston, A. B. D., Lichtenstein, G., Lynes, L. S., Oloko, M., Sánchez Luja, M., Shackleton, S., Soriano, M., Sosa Peréz, F., & Vasseur, L. (2023). Guiding principles for transdisciplinary sustainability research and practice. People and Nature. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10496

  • Renn, O. (2023). Konzepte und Strategien transdisziplinärer Forschung. J. Blank, C. Bergmüller-Hauptmann, & S. Sälzle (Eds.) Transformationsanspruch in Forschung und Bildung: Konzepte, Projekte, empirische Perspektiven, 21–48. https://publications.rifs-potsdam.de/rest/items/item_6002911_5/component/file_6002912/content

  • Reusswig, F. (2023). Landwirtschaft und Klimaskepsis in populistischen Zeiten. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 33(1), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.33.1.3

  • Rigolot, C. (2023). Biodynamic farming research and transdisciplinary knowledge co-production: Exploring the synergies. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(4), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.4.4

  • Rist, S., Bottazzi, P., & Jacobi, J. (2023). CRITICAL SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCES intercultural and emancipatory perspectives. ROUTLEDGE. https://www.routledge.com/Critical-Sustainability-Sciences-Intercultural-and-Emancipatory-Perspectives/Rist-Bottazzi-Jacobi/p/book/9780367489410

  • Robinson. (2023). Cognition and Hermeneutics: Convergences in the Study of Translation—Zeta Books Online. https://zetabooks.com/all-titles/cognition-and-hermeneutics-convergences-in-the-study-of-translation/

  • Robson-Williams, M., Harcourt, N., & Mercier, O. (2023). Achieving societal collaboration and impact in Aotearoa-New Zealand through transdisciplinarity. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.9

  • Ruano, J. C., & Pasquier, F. (2023). Transdisciplinary. In Handbook of the Anthropocene (pp. 491–495). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4_77

  • Saleh, amany. (2023). Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education. Special Issue: Traveling Concepts. https://www.ojed.org/index.php/jise/issue/view/198

  • Schaltegger, A.-S., Brombach, L., & Vienni Baptista, B. (2023). INTERSECTIONS Literature Review Dataset: Bibliography on Intersections between Cultures, Practices and Policy in IDR/TDR. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000632756

  • Schaltegger, A.-S., & Vienni Baptista, B. (2023). INTERSECTIONS: Literature Review Query Strings for Web of Science, Scopus and JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000632748

  • Scharoun, L., Belek Fialho Teixeira, M., Hills, D., Fialho Teixeira, F., Flynn, D., & Gudur, R. R. (2023). Understanding Design Culture from East to West: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Teaching. In L. Scharoun, D. Meth, P. Crowther, D. Brough, M. Belek Fialho Teixeira, & L. O. Burton (Eds.), Contemporary Design Education in Australia: Creating Transdisiplinary Futures (pp. 225–248). Intellect Ltd. https://intellectdiscover.com/content/books/9781789388671.c10

  • Scharoun, L., Meth, D., Crowther, P., Brough, D., Belek Fialho Teixeira, M., & Burton, L. O. (2023). Contemporary Design Education in Australia: Creating Transdisciplinary Futures. https://www.intellectbooks.com/contemporary-design-education-in-australia

  • Schlaepfer-Miller, J., Kueffer, C., & Dahinden, M. (2023). Climate Garden 2085: An easily applicable transdisciplinary public art-science experiment for transformative learning about climate change. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2023, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-023-03899-2

  • Schneider, F., Patel, Z., Paulavets, K., Buser, T., Kado, J., & Burkhart, S. (2023). Fostering transdisciplinary research for sustainability in the Global South: Pathways to impact for funding programmes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2023 10:1, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02138-3

  • Schuch, K., Lampert, D., Neuhuber, T., Demir, U., Koller, K., & Plumhans, L.-A. (2023). Social Innovation as Valuation and Outcome Category of SNSF-funded Research. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7756474

  • Shackleton, R. T., Walters, G., Bluwstein, J., Djoudi, H., Fritz, L., Lafaye de Micheaux, F., Loloum, T., Nguyen, V. T. H., Rann Andriamahefazafy, M., Sithole, S. S., & Kull, C. A. (2023). Navigating power in conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(3), e12877. https://doi.org/10.1111/CSP2.12877

  • Singer-Brodowski, M. (2023). The potential of transformative learning for sustainability transitions: Moving beyond formal learning environments. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-022-02444-X/METRICS

  • Sozialwissenschaften, S. A. der G.- und. (2023). Wege zu einem nachhaltigen Konsum | Vers une consommation durable. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.8135855

  • Stolze, R. (2023). Humantranslation: Der Translator als Person. Zeta Books. https://zetabooks.com/all-titles/humantranslation-der-translator-als-person/

  • Studer, S., & Pohl, C. (2023a). Methodensammlungen für die transdisziplinäre Forschung. Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37222-4_18-1

  • Studer, S., & Pohl, C. (2023b). Toolkits for transdisciplinary research: State of the art, challenges, and potentials for further developments. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap-oa/book/9781802207835/book-part-9781802207835-44.xml

  • Surchat, M., Irakoze, M., Kantengwa, S., Konlambigue, M., Späth, L., Wilde, B., Six, J., Krütli, P., & Stauffacher, M. (2023). “The bad job brings the good one”: Photovoice study with female and male waste workers in Rwanda. Local Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2023.2287052

  • Swiss Science Council. (n.d.). Mission-oriented Research and Innovation in Switzerland—Analysis and Recommendations by the Swiss Science Council SSC. 2023. Retrieved 26 October 2023, from www.wissenschaftsrat.ch

  • TA-Swiss. (2023). ChatGPT – wenn die künstliche Intelligenz schreibt wie ein Mensch. Und was es dabei zu beachten gilt. https://www.ta-swiss.ch/app/uploads/2023/04/ThemenpapierChatGPT-DE.pdf

  • Tchouaffé Tchiadje N. (2023). Science-Policy-Data interface for responding to COVID-19 in Cameroon—LIBROTERRA. https://libro-terra.com/shop/science/strong-science-policy-data-interface-for-responding-to-covid-19-in-cameroon-strong-1224/

  • Thieme, S., Vögeli, I., Winkel, M., & Tschiderer, L. (2023). Care-Arbeit erzählbar machen – Transdisziplinäre Lehre als Aushandlung zwischen geographischer Forschung und künstlerischer Praxis. https://www.qupug.at/index.php?LDmMczcodt1eXFxrY%2Fptm2HATqzNZHr3KNgqfkyAgSEtohuQQY7q8cVqUN%2FD4LYnOLIiky4e9aAS3Thq7EHczA%3D%3D

  • Thieme, S., & Fry, P. E. (2023). Teaching transdisciplinary competencies for sustainability transformation by co-producing social learning videos. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.13

  • Thorpe, H., Bekker, S., Fullagar, S., Mkumbuzi, N., Nimphius, S., Pape, M., Sims, S. T., & Travers, A. (2023). Advancing feminist innovation in sport studies: A transdisciplinary dialogue on gender, health and wellbeing. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 484. https://doi.org/10.3389/FSPOR.2022.1060851/BIBTEX

  • Tiwari, A. D., Pokhrel, Y., Kramer, D., Akhter, T., Tang, Q., Liu, J., Qi, J., Loc, H. H., & Lakshmi, V. (2023). A synthesis of hydroclimatic, ecological, and socioeconomic data for transdisciplinary research in the Mekong. Scientific Data 2023 10:1, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02193-0

  • Trechsel, L. J., Diebold, C. L., Zimmermann, A. B., & Fischer, M. (2023). Students between science and society: Why students’ learning experiences in transformative spaces are vital to higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0407

  • Tydecks, L., Richerzhagen, C., Sulmowski, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2023). Auf dem Weg zu einem nachhaltigen Hochschul- und Wissenschaftssystem. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(3), 338–340. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.3.14

  • Vadrot, A. B. M. (2023). Protecting Life below Water: In The Environment in Global Sustainability Governance (pp. 72–97). Bristol University Press.

  • Valle, D. de las N. M., García, O. L., Hernandez, B. D., Abreu, M. I. P., Pérez, D. Q., Silva, L. C., Carmo, L. P., Berezowski, J., Zamora, P. A., & Dürr, S. (2023). Toward a One Health Surveillance System in Cuba: Co-Productive Stakeholder Engagement. One Health Cases, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1079/ONEHEALTHCASES.2023.0024

  • van Breda, J. (2023). Co-constructing Dynamic thick / Deep Maps for Doing Transformative Transdisciplinary Research (TTDR) in the Context of Complex Sustainability Transitions. International Journal of Sustainable Development Research. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJSDR.20230902.12

  • Vetter, A. (n.d.). Www.ssoar.info Konviviale Technik: Empirische Technikethik für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: Transcript Verlag. 2023. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839453544

  • Vienni-Baptista, B., Flechter, I., & Lyall Catherine. (2023). Foundations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research. Bristol University Press.

  • Villalba, L., & Vienni Baptista, B. (2023). Inter- and Transdisciplinary research in Integrated Water Resources Management: Insights from a case study in Tandil, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 89–123.

  • Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., & Kok, M. T. (2023). Transforming Biodiversity Governance Transforming Biodiversity Governance Edited by (p. 8). https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/528A21807B7F533EFEABD55EB0FC67F6Downloadedfromhttps://www.cambridge.org/core

  • Walker, B., Crépin, A. S., Nyström, M., Anderies, J. M., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., Queiroz, C., Barrett, S., Bennett, E., Cardenas, J. C., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., de Zeeuw, A., Fischer, J., Folke, C., Levin, S., Nyborg, K., Polasky, S., Segerson, K., … Vincent, J. R. (2023). Response diversity as a sustainability strategy. Nature Sustainability 2023 6:6, 6(6), 621–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01048-7

  • Wallenhorst, N., & Wulf, C. (Eds.). (2023). Handbook of the Anthropocene: Humans between Heritage and Future. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25910-4

  • Wang, N., Mutzner, N., & Blanchet, K. (2023). Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review. Technology in Society, 75, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2023.102377

  • Wernli, D., & Ohlmeyer, J. (2023). Implementing interdisciplinarity in research-intensive universities: Good practices and challenges.

  • Wieland, A., Stevenson, M., Melnyk, S. A., Davoudi, S., & Schultz, L. (2023). Thinking Differently about Supply Chain Resilience: What We Can Learn from Social-ecological Systems Thinking. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 43(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2022-0645

  • Wussow, P. (2023). Expertokraie Über das schwierige Verhätlnis von Wissen und Macht. https://www.socialnet.de/buchversand/?isbn=9783849704599

  • Z’GuG Zeitschrift für Gemeinwirtschaft und Gemeinwohl. (2023). Z’GuG Zeitschrift Für Gemeinwirtschaft Und Gemeinwohl, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.5771/2701-4193-2023-2

  • Zonta, A. L., Jacobi, J., Mukhovi, S. M., Birachi, E., Groote, P. von, & Abad, C. R. (2023). The role of transdisciplinarity in building a decolonial bridge between science, policy, and practice. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.32.1.7

  • 1_itd2021_conferencereport_12jan2022.pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved 18 July 2024, from https://api.swiss-academies.ch/site/assets/files/48593/1_itd2021_conferencereport_12jan2022.pdf

  • 10 Principi Svizzeri Della Citizen Science (2022).

  • 10 Principles Suisses de Sciences Citoyennes (2022).

  • 10 Schweizer Citizen-Science-Prinzipien (2022).

  • 10 Swiss Citizen Science Principles (2022).

  • 20 Impulse für 2022. (2022, January).

  • A Science|Business Special Report. (2022). www.bigstockphoto.com

  • AGREEMENT ON REFORMING RESEARCH ASSESSMENT. (2022).

  • Akiyama, Y., & Woodill, S. (2022). A Survey on How Post-Secondary Courses in Interdisciplinary Studies Are Taught. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 13(1), 4624–4630. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2022.0568

  • Ammon, K., Falk, M., & Pfister, J. (2022a). Science Advice Network: Ideenpapier für einen klaren und steten Dialog zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik. Swiss Academies Communications, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6641588

  • Ammon, K., Falk, M., & Pfister, J. (2022b). Science Advice Network: Proposition en vue d’un dialogue clair et permanent entre le scientifique et le politique. Swiss Academies Communications, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6772797

  • Augenstein, K., Bögel, P. M., Levin-Keitel, M., & Trenks, H. (2022). Wie entfalten Reallabore Wirkung für die Transformation? Eine embedded-agency perspective zur Analyse von Wirkmechanismen in Reallaboren. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(4), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.4.4

  • Bandola-Gill, J., Arthur, M., & Ivor Leng, R. (2022). What is co-production? Conceptualising and understanding co-production of knowledge and policy across different theoretical perspectives. Evidence & Policy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16420955772641

  • Beck, S., Brasseur, T. M., Poetz, M., & Sauermann, H. (2022). Crowdsourcing research questions in science. Research Policy, 51(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104491

  • Beck, S., Grimpe, C., Poetz, M., & Sauermann, H. (2022). Introduction to the Special Issue on Open Innovation in Science. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2033179

  • Bengert, E., Towle-Miller, L., Boccardo, J., Mercene, G., Ohtake, P. J., Balkundi, P., Elkin, P. L., Balthasar, J., Murphy, T. F., & Noyes, K. (2022). Novel approach for tracking interdisciplinary research productivity using institutional databases. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 6(1), e119. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2022.455

  • Bernert, P., Wanner, M., Fischer, N., & Barth, M. (2022). Design principles for advancing higher education sustainability learning through transformative research. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02801-w

  • Beyerl, K., Bogner, F., Daskalakis, M., Decker, T., Hentschel, A., Hinzmann, M., Loges, B., Knoblauch, D., Mederake, L., Müller, Ruth, Rubik, F., Schweiger, S., & Stieß, I. (2022). Wege zum nachhaltigen Umgang mit Kunststoffen: Kernbotschaften sozialwissenschaftlicher Forschung. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(1), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.1.12

  • BEYOND LIMITS New Ways to Reinvent Higher Education. (2022).

  • Bögel, P. M., Augenstein, K., Levin-Keitel, M., & Upham, P. (2022). An interdisciplinary perspective on scaling in transitions: Connecting actors and space. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.12.009

  • Breda, J. V. (2022). Using Synergic Methods for Being Methodologically Agile (SM4BMA). Http://Www.Sciencepublishinggroup.Com, 8(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJSDR.20220802.14

  • Broo, D. G. (2022). Transdisciplinarity and three mindsets for sustainability in the age of cyber-physical systems. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 27, 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100290

  • CareComLabs. (2022). Bausteine Sorgende Gemeinschaft—Aus der Praxis für die Praxis.

  • Centre for Social Innovation Social Innovation as Valuation and Outcome Category of SNSF-funded Research Report. (2022). www.zsi.at

  • Chambers, J. M., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. L., Ryan, M., Serban, A., Bennett, N. J., Brennan, R., Charli-Joseph, L., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., Galvin, K. A., Goldstein, B. E., Haller, T., Hill, R., Munera, C., Nel, J. L., Österblom, H., Reid, R. S., Riechers, M., Spierenburg, M., … Rondeau, R. (2022). Co-productive agility and four collaborative pathways to sustainability transformations. Global Environmental Change, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102422

  • Costa, L. da S. G. M. da. (2022a). Applied Transdisciplinarity through Plato Philosophy, Taoism, Alchemical Tradition and Jungian Psychology. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00176

  • Costa, L. da S. G. M. da. (2022b). HPTD-M: Transdisciplinary Integration of Three Paradigms—Mechanistic, Systemic and Synchronistic. Plastir, 65(6), 17–50.

  • Cravens, A. E., Jones, M. S., Ngai, C., Zarestky, J., & Love, H. B. (2022). Science facilitation: Navigating the intersection of intellectual and interpersonal expertise in scientific collaboration. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01217-1

  • Cuevas, M. F. G. (2022). Las ficciones Borgeanas y su comprensión transdisciplinar. Brazilian Journal of Development, 55207–55215. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n8-033

  • Da, L., & Guimarães Martins Da Costa, S. (2022). The Holopraxis Transdisciplinary Management (HPTD-M) Background, Publications, and Influencers of the Theory and Praxis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21666.71368

  • Da, L., Guimarães, S., & Da Costa, M. (2022). 2/21-Feature Articles Effectiveness and Styles of Leadership in Public Management: Quality in the Context of Transdisciplinary HPTD-M Theory.

  • Da Silva Guimarães Martins da Costa, L. (2022). The Four Elements of the Ancient Traditions and Philosophies Rediscovered Throughthe Unified Model of the HPTD-M Theory.

  • DA SILVA GUIMARÃES MARTINS DA COSTA, L. (2022). TRANSDISCIPLINARITY THEORY THROUGH PLATO PHILOSOPHY, TAOISM, ALCHEMICAL TRADITION AND JUNGIAN PSYCHOLOGY. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00162

  • Darbellay, F. (2022a). Creativity and Interdisciplinarity. European Psychologist, 27(3), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000482

  • Darbellay, F. (2022b). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: Encounter of two fields of study and foundations for a happy marriage. European Psychologist.

  • Drees, L., Liehr, S., Batbuyan, B., Marg, O., & Mehring, M. (2022). In search of a nomadic pastoralism for the 21st century. A transdisciplinary development of future scenarios to foster a social-ecological transformation in Mongolia. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(3), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2100744

  • Dressel, M. (2022). Models of science and society: Transcending the antagonism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01261-x

  • Erazo Acosta, E. (2022). Sumak Kawsay—Alli Kawsay-Buen Vivir, Epistemology in the Indigenous Communities of Ecuador and Colombia, an Opportunity for Environmental Justice and Rethinking the Global Community. Economics and Policy of Energy and Environmental Sustainability, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5061-2_15

  • Espinosa, A. (2022). Sustainable self-governance in businesses and society: The viable system model in action. Sustainable Self-Governance in Businesses and Society: The Viable System Model in Action, 1–313. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490835/SUSTAINABLE-SELF-GOVERNANCE-BUSINESSES-SOCIETY-ANGELA-ESPINOSA

  • FDA (Food and Drug Administration). (2022). Diversity Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations in Clinical Trials Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-

  • Franssen, T. (2022). Enriching research quality: A proposition for stakeholder heterogeneity. Research Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac012

  • Fritz, L., Vilsmaier, U., Clément, G., Daffe, L., Pagani, A., Pang, M., Gatica-Perez, D., Kaufmann, V., Santiago Delefosse, M., & Binder, C. R. (2022). Explore, engage, empower: Methodological insights into a transformative mixed methods study tackling the COVID-19 lockdown. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01197-2

  • GAIA. (2022). GAIA. GAIA, 1. https://www.oekom.de/ausgabe/01-2022-80866

  • Galeno, A., & Castro, G. (2022). Balzac and the Literature of Complexity.

  • Geddes, I. (2022). Creating built environments: Bridging knowledge and practice divides. Cities & Health, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2050104

  • Gibbs, P. (2022). Transdisciplinarity as subversion: In space and place. Quality in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2022.2156027

  • Gisler, M. (2022). Zwischen Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik—75 Jahre Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften. Schwabe Verlag. https://doi.org/10.24894/978-3-7965-4421-7

  • Grundmann, R. (2022). Making Sense of Expertise. Cases from Law, Medicine, Journalism, Covid-19, and Climate Change. Routledge.

  • Guisan, A. (ed), Huggel, C. (ed), Seneviratne, S. I. (ed), & Steinberger, J. (ed). (2022). Trendwende Klima und Biodiversität. Parlament trifft Wissenschaft | Inverser la tendance: Climate et biodiversité. Rencontre entre le Parlement et les scientifiques. Akademie der Naturwissenschaften Schweiz.

  • Herbechter, S., Callus, I., Rossini, M., Grech, M., de Bruin-Molé, M., & Müller, C. J. (2022). Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Hoffmann, S., Deutsch, L., Klein, J. T., & O’Rourke, M. (2022). Integrate the integrators! A call for establishing academic careers for integration experts. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01138-z

  • Hoffmann, S., Weber, C., & Mitchell, C. (2022). Principles for Leading, Learning, and Synthesizing in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac057

  • Hofmann, B. (2022). Mainstreaming Earth System Governance into the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Earth System Governance, 12, 100139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100139

  • Horcea-Milcu, A.-I. (2022). Values as leverage points for sustainability transformation: Two pathways for transformation research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 57, 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101205

  • Horcea-Milcu, A.-I., Leventon, J., & Lang, D. J. (2022). Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019

  • Horn, A., Urias, E., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2022). Epistemic stability and epistemic adaptability: Interdisciplinary knowledge integration competencies for complex sustainability issues. Sustainability Science, 17(5), 1959–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01113-2

  • Hüncke, A., Plessing, J., & Ratzmann, N. (2022). Kollaborative Klima-Governance in Marburg. Chancen und Hemmnisse auf dem Weg zur Klimaneutralität. IASS.

  • Industry and Innovation. (2022). Industry and Innovation: Open Innovation in Science. Industry and Innovation, 29(2).

  • INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR THE GREEN AND DIGITAL TRANSITION 2022 Colophon. (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7260787

  • Jacobi, J., Llanque, A., Mukhovi, S. M., Birachi, E., von Groote, P., Eschen, R., Hilber-Schöb, I., Kiba, D. I., Frossard, E., & Robledo-Abad, C. (2022). Transdisciplinary co-creation increases the utilization of knowledge from sustainable development research. Environmental Science and Policy, 129, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.017

  • Jahn, S., Newig, J., Lang, D. J., Kahle, J., & Bergmann, M. (2022). Demarcating transdisciplinary research in sustainability science—Five clusters of research modes based on evidence from 59 research projects. Sustainable Development, 30(2), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2278

  • Jollivet, P., & Pasquier, F. (2022). Le biohacking au risque de la complexité. Management des technologies organisationnelles, 15(2), 213–225.

  • Karrer, L., Steinböck, C., Julia Trechsel, L., da Silva, T., & Breu, T. (2023). IGS North-South Tracer Study 2022: Decolonizing a PhD Programme and Beyond. https://doi.org/10.48350/182165

  • Kastenhofer, K., & Bauer, A. (2022). “Are You a TA Practitioner, Then?” – Identity Constructions in Post-Normal Science. Minerva, 61(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09480-x

  • Kaul, S., Akbulut, B., Demaria, F., & Gerber, J. F. (2022). Alternatives to sustainable development: What can we learn from the pluriverse in practice? Sustainability Science, 17(4), 1149–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01210-2

  • Keestra, M., Uilhoorn, A., & Zandveld, J. (2022). An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Research. https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789463724692/an-introduction-to-interdisciplinary-research

  • Keller, R., Clivaz, M., Backhaus, N., Reynard, E., Lehmann, P., & Schüpbach, U. (2022). Leistungen von Landschaften fassbar machen.

  • Kirchner, M., Stevanov, M., & Krott, M. (2022). How to Use Scientific Information: Road Map for Tailoring Your Own Natural Hazard Risk Management Solution. In Protective Forests as Ecosystem-based Solution for Disaster Risk Reduction (Eco-DRR). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99518

  • Kligyte, G., Buck, A., Le Hunte, B., Ulis, S., McGregor, A., & Wilson, B. (2022). Re-imagining transdisciplinary education work through liminality: Creative third space in liminal times. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00519-2

  • Kotsioris, E., & Meister, A.-M. (2022). Radical Pedagogies. The Mit Press.

  • Kreimer, P. (2022). Techno-Scientific Promises, Disciplinary Fields, and Social Issues in Peripheral Contexts.

  • Krieger, M., Joshi, J., & Küffer, C. (2022). Der Campus als Freiraumlabor. G Plus, 3, 11–13.

  • Kruijf, J. V., Verbrugge, L., Schröter, B., Haan, R., Cortes Arevalo, J., Fliervoet, J., Henze, J., & Albert, C. (2022). Knowledge co‐production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects. Sustainable Development, June 2021, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2281

  • Kuiper, J. J., van Wijk, D., Mooij, W. M., Remme, R. P., Peterson, G. D., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mooij, C. J., Leltz, G. M., & Pereira, L. M. (2022). Exploring desirable nature futures for Nationaal Park Hollandse Duinen. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2065360

  • Langvatn, S. Aa., & Holst, C. (2022). Expert accountability: What does it mean, why is it challenging—And is it what we need? Constellations. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12649

  • Laursen, B. K., Motzer, N., & Anderson, K. J. (2022). Pathways for assessing interdisciplinarity: A systematic review. Research Evaluation, 31(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvac013

  • Lawrence, M. G., Williams, S., Nanz, P., & Renn, O. (2022). Characteristics, potentials, and challenges of transdisciplinary research. One Earth, 5(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.010

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2022a). Being Human: Rethinking Adaptation and Resilience. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 13, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00208

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2022b). Co‐Benefits of Transdisciplinary Planning for Healthy Cities. Urban Planning, 7(4), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5674

  • Lopes Pinheiro, S. (2022). Caminhos Transdisciplinares para um Autoconhecimento Emergente Em Educação Ambiental.

  • Love, H. B., Fosdick, B. K., Cross, J. E., Suter, M., Egan, D., Tofany, E., & Fisher, E. R. (2022). Towards understanding the characteristics of successful and unsuccessful collaborations: A case-based team science study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01388-x

  • Lüdke, D. U., Rossow, V., Nicola Stefan Liehr, & Liehr, S. (2022). ISOE Policy Brief 09—How to reach people through knowledge transfer.

  • Lundsgaard-Hansen, L. M., Oberlack, C., Hunt, G., & Schneider, F. (2022). The (In)Ability of a Multi-Stakeholder Platform to Address Land Conflicts—Lessons Learnt from an Oil Palm Landscape in Myanmar. Land, 11(8), 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081348

  • Mahjoubi, I., Bossenbroek, L., Berger, E., & Frör, O. (2022). Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions of Water Ecosystem Services to Enhance Resilience in the Middle Drâa Valley, Southern Morocco. Sustainability, 14(8), 4765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084765

  • Mast, H. S. (2022). Conflicting sociotechnical imaginaries of the future built environment. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(3), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.3.5

  • Mokiy, V., & Lucyanova, T. (2022). Sustainable Development of Nature and Society in the Context of a Systems Transdisciplinary Paradigm. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00192

  • Mokiy, V., & Lukyanova, T. (2022a). Covid-19: Systems Transdisciplinary Generalization, Technical and Technological Ideas, and Solutions. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 25, 001–021. https://doi.org/10.28945/4893

  • Mokiy, V., & Lukyanova, T. (2022b). Manifesto for Systems Transdisciplinarity (2023—2030).

  • Mokiy, V., & Lukyanova, T. (2022c). Modern Transdisciplinarity: Results of the Development of the Prime Cause and Initial Ideas. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 19, 097–120. https://doi.org/10.28945/4951

  • Mokiy, V., & Lukyanova, T. (2022d). Prospects of Integrating Transdisciplinarity and Systems Thinking in the Historical Framework of Various Socio-Cultural Contexts. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00184

  • Mountain Research and Development. (2022a). Addressing Challenges of Hazards, Risks and Disaster Management in Mountain Regions. Mountain Research and Development, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741-42.2.p2

  • Mountain Research and Development. (2022b). Mountain Research and Development. Mountain Research and Development, 42(1).

  • Mountain Research and Development Vol 41, No 4: Pastoralism and Rangelands in Mountains - ICIMOD. (2022, February 11). https://www.icimod.org/mountain-research-and-development-vol-41-no-4-pastoralism-and-rangelands-in-mountains/

  • Ness, B., & Wahl, D. (2022). Getting personal with collaborative sustainability experimentation: Reflections and recommendations from a transdisciplinary partnership with the Swedish craft beer sector. Ambio, 51(12), 2544–2556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01751-x

  • Neumann, V. A., & Hack, J. (2022). Revealing and assessing the costs and benefits of nature-based solutions within a real-world laboratory in Costa Rica. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 93, 106737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106737

  • Norström, A. V., Agarwal, B., Balvanera, P., Baptiste, B., Bennett, E. M., Brondízio, E., Biggs, R., Campbell, B., Carpenter, S. R., Castilla, J. C., Castro, A. J., Cramer, W., Cumming, G. S., Felipe-Lucia, M., Fischer, J., Folke, C., DeFries, R., Gelcich, S., Groth, J., … Spierenburg, M. (2022). The programme on ecosystem change and society (PECS) – a decade of deepening social-ecological research through a place-based focus. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), 598–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2133173

  • Oltmanns, A., Knieling, J., & Kretschmann, N. (2022). The transformational power of real-life experiments for the mobility transition in cities. How temporary car-free zones are changing city centres for the long term. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.31.2.7

  • Österblom, H., Bebbington, J., Blasiak, R., Sobkowiak, M., & Folke, C. (2022). Annual Review of Environment and Resources Transnational Corporations, Biosphere Stewardship, and Sustainable Futures. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120

  • Özdamar, E. G. (2022). The “Pink panther” in architecture: The transdisciplinary approach and thought without image. Trans/Form/Ação, 45(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2022.v45n2.p127

  • Pahl-Weber, E., Jeutner, M., Flade, K., & Gabsch, G. (2022). Leitfaden Ko-Kreation: Urbane Transformationen mit Urban Design Thinking. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin. https://verlag.tu-berlin.de/en/produkt/978-3-7983-3249-2/

  • Palmer, H., Simon, D., & Riise, J. (2022). Urban research for sustainability: Developign a comparative transdisciplinary co-production approach to realise just cities. International Journal of Sustainable Development.

  • Pärli, R., Fischer, M., & Lieberherr, E. (2022). What are the effects of transdisciplinary research projects in the global North and South? A comparative analysis. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100180

  • Paulsen, T., & Studer, S. (2022). Transdisziplinäre Ko-produktion von Wissen – das Potential einer Perspektive Pluri / Transdisciplinární tvorba znalostí – potenciál tzv. Pluriperspektivy. In T. Weber & H. Böhm (Eds.), Wissenskommunikation unter Bedingungen von Mehrsprachigkeit. Peter Lang.

  • Pearce, B. B. J., Dallo, I., Choi, V., Freihardt, J., & Middel, C. N. H. (2022). Forks in the road: Critical design moments for identifying key processes in stakeholder interaction. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(4), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.4.6

  • Pearce, B. J., Deutsch, L., Fry, P., Marafatto, F. F., & Lieu, J. (2022). Going beyond the AHA! moment: Insight discovery for transdisciplinary research and learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01129-0

  • Pelikan, K., Abdikadir, M. I., Tschopp, R., & Zinsstag, J. (2022). Transdisziplinäre Zusammenarbeit impliziert Mehrsprachigkeit. Das Beispiel der Jigjiga University One Health Initiative / Transdisciplinární spolupráce implikuje vícejazyčnost: Příklad Jigiiga One Health Initiative. In T. Weber & H. Böhm (Eds.), Wissenskommunikation unter Bedingungen von Mehrsprachigkeit. Peter Lang.

  • Rigolot, C. (2022). Transdisciplinarity as a way of being: A new perspective on personal engagement for sustainability transformations. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.22545/2022/00187

  • Riveros, P. S., Meriño, J., Crespo, F., & Vienni Baptista, B. (2022). Situated transdisciplinarity in university policy: Lessons for its institutionalization. Higher Education, 84(5), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00812-6

  • Sallaberry, J.-C. (2022). Complexité et Anthropocène. https://pasquierflorent.wixsite.com/pasquier/post/parutions-de-3-articles-dans-arse-2021-2022

  • Sattler, C., Rommel, J., Chen, C., García-Llorente, M., Gutiérrez-Briceño, I., Prager, K., Reyes, M. F., Schröter, B., Schulze, C., van Bussel, L. G. J., Loft, L., Matzdorf, B., & Kelemen, E. (2022). Participatory research in times of COVID-19 and beyond: Adjusting your methodological toolkits. One Earth, 5(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.12.006

  • Schneider, F., Llanque-Zonta, A., Andriamihaja, O. R., Andriatsitohaina, R. N. N., Tun, A. M., Boniface, K., Jacobi, J., Celio, E., Diebold, C. L., Patrick, L., Latthachack, P., Llopis, J. C., Lundsgaard-Hansen, L., Messerli, P., Mukhovi, S., Tun, N. N., Rabemananjara, Z. H., Ramamonjisoa, B. S., Thongmanivong, S., … Zaehringer, J. G. (2022). How context affects transdisciplinary research: Insights from Asia, Africa and Latin America. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01201-3

  • Schroeder, M. J. (2022). Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity: The Tower of Babel in the Age of Two Cultures. Philosophies, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7020026

  • Schröter, B., Hack, J., Hüesker, F., Kuhlicke, C., & Albert, C. (2022). Beyond Demonstrators—Tackling fundamental problems in amplifying nature-based solutions for the post-COVID-19 world. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-022-00047-z

  • Schuck-Zöller, S., Bathiany, S., Dressel, M., El Zohbi, J., Keup-Thiel, E., Rechid, D., & Mirko, S. (2022). Developing criteria of successful processes in co-creative research. A formative evaluation scheme for climate services. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.541

  • Sell, K., Hommes, F., Fischer, F., & Arnold, L. (2022). Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinarity within the Public Health Workforce: A Scoping Review to Assess Definitions and Applications of Concepts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710902

  • Smaldino, P. E., & O’Connor, C. (2022). Interdisciplinarity can aid the spread of better methods between scientific communities. Collective Intelligence, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221131816

  • Strand, M., Rivers, N., Baasch, R., & Snow, B. (2022). Developing arts-based participatory research for more inclusive knowledge co-production in Algoa Bay. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100178

  • Suhari, M., Dressel, M., & Schuck-Zöller, S. (2022). Challenges and best-practices of co-creation: A qualitative interview study in the field of climate services. Climate Services, 25, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100282

  • Survey Questions 2022 Strategic planning survey for the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. (n.d.). https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSduOcTK6tEo4I0W-uktc...

  • Szostak, R. (2022). Integrating the Human Sciences. Routledge.

  • Theiler, L., & Lux, A. (2022). Transdisziplinarität als Forschungsmodus für integrative Klimaforschung. In Y. Ibrahim & S. Rödder (Eds.), Schlüsselwerke der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Klimaforschung (Vol. 2, pp. 407–414). transcript Verlag.

  • Torralba, M., García-Martín, M., Bieling, C., & Plieninger, T. (2022). Participatory research methods for sustainability. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.31.1.1

  • Trechsel, L. J., Diebold, C. L., Zimmermann, A. B., & Fischer, M. (2022). Students between science and society: Why students’ learning experiences in transformative spaces are vital to higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0407/FULL/PDF

  • USYS TdLab & td-net. (2022). International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021. Creating Spaces and Cultivating Mindsets for Learning and Experimentation. Conference Report. www.transdisciplinarity.ch

  • Vereijken, M. W. C., Akkerman, S. F., te Pas, S. F., van der Tuin, I., & Kluijtmans, M. (2022). ‘Undisciplining’ higher education without losing disciplines: Furthering transformative potential for students. Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2156482

  • Vienni Baptista, B., & Thompson Klein, J. (Eds.). (2022). Institutionalizing Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity. Collaboration across Cultures and Communities. Routledge.

  • Vilsmaier, U., & Fam, D. (2022). The Responsive and Constitutive Character of Transdisciplinarity: Consequences for Higher Education. Journal of Educational Studies, 21(1). https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-jeds_v21_n1_a3

  • Waboso, N., Davis, S., & Mitchell, R. C. (2022). A Transdisciplinary Analysis of Creativity within Fridays for Future School Strikes: Or “Pay No Attention to That Man Behind the Curtain”. Routledge Handbook for Creative Futures, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003020714-31

  • Wac, K. (ed. ), & Wulfovich, S. (ed. ). (2022). Quantifying Quality of Life. Incorporating Daily Life into Medicine. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-94212-0#about

  • Weber, T. (ed. ), & Böhm, H. (ed. ). (2022). Wissenskommunikation unter Bedingungen von Mehrsprachigkeit. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/wissenskommunikation-unter-bedingungen-von-mehrsprachigkeit-tilo-weber/1141670323?ean=9783631795446

  • Wehling, P. (2022). Transdisziplinarität und Solutionismus: Ein verfehlter Vorwurf, aus dem sich trotzdem einiges lernen lässt. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.1.6

  • Wendt, B., & Köhrsen, J. (2022). Time for change? Time as a challenge for sustainability participation processes. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 31(4), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.31.4.5

  • West, S., & Schill, C. (2022). Negotiating the ethical-political dimensions of research methods: A key competency in mixed methods, inter- and transdisciplinary, and co-production research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01297-z

  • Wilson, C., Janes, G., & Williams, J. (2022). Identity, positionality and reflexivity: Relevance and application to research paramedics. British Paramedic Journal, 7(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43

  • Zhang, J., Fedder, B., Wang, D., & Jennerjahn, T. C. (2022). A knowledge exchange framework to connect research, policy, and practice, developed through the example of the Chinese island of Hainan. Environmental Science & Policy, 136, 530–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.016

  • Zinsstag, J., Hediger, K., Osman, Y. M., Abukhattab, S., Crump, L., Kaiser-Grolimund, A., Mauti, S., Ahmed, A., Hattendorf, J., Bonfoh, B., Heitz-Tokpa, K., Berger González, M., Bucher, A., Lechenne, M., Tschopp, R., Obrist, B., & Pelikan, K. (2022). The Promotion and Development of One Health at Swiss TPH and Its Greater Potential. Diseases, 10(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases10030065

  • Zscheischler, J., Brunsch, R., Rogga, S., & Scholz, R. W. (2022). Perceived risks and vulnerabilities of employing digitalization and digital data in agriculture – Socially robust orientations from a transdisciplinary process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358, 132034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132034

  • Zwischen Sprachen—Zur persönlichen Interdisziplinarität. (2022). Briefe Zur Interdisziplinarität, 28.

  • Aebi-Müller, R. E., Blatter, I., Brigger, J., Constable, E. C., Eglin, N., Hoffmeyer, P., Lautenschütz, C., Lienhard, A., Pirinoli, C., Röthlisberger, M., & Spycher, K. M. (2021). Kodex zur wissenschaftlichen Integrität. In Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz: Vol. 1. Auflage. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4707584

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz (Hrsg). (2021a). Covid-19—Science and Society | Covid-19—Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft | Covid-19—Science et Société.

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz (Hrsg). (2021b). Kodex zur wissenschaftlichen Integrität.

  • Akandil, C., Ismail, S., & Kueffer, C. (2021). No green deal without a nature-based economy. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(4). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/oekom/gaia/2021/00000030/00000004/art00014#

  • Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2021). Learning from the whirlpools of existence: Crises and transformative processes as complex and rhythmic phenomena. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.3914

  • Antoni-Komar, I., Rommel, M., Wittkamp, M., Posse, D., & Paech, N. (2021a). Stable Schools in der Solidarischen Landwirtschaft: Ein transdisziplinäres Setting zur Förderung organisationaler Stabilität. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350721603

  • Antoni-Komar, I., Rommel, M., Wittkamp, M., Posse, D., & Paech, N. (2021b). Stable Schools in der Solidarischen Landwirtschaft: Ein transdisziplinäres Setting zur Förderung organisationaler Stabilität nascent-New opportunities for a sustainable food system by transformative business models View project Dirk Posse STABLE SCHOOLS IN DER SOLIDARISCHEN LANDWIRTSCHAFT: EIN TRANSDISZIPLINÄRES SETTING ZUR FÖRDERUNG ORGANISATIONALER STABILITÄT STABLE SCHOOLS IN DER SOLIDARISCHEN LANDWIRTSCHAFT: EIN TRANSDISZIPLINÄRES SETTING ZUR FÖRDERUNG ORGANISATIONALER STABILITÄT. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350721603

  • Bamzai-Dodson, A., Cravens, A. E., Wade, A., & McPherson, R. A. (2021). Engaging with stakeholders to produce actionable science: A framework and guidance. Weather, Climate, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0046.1

  • Baptista, B. V., Pearce, B. B., Stauffacher, M., Krütli, P., Paulsen, T., & Buser, T. (2021). Creating spaces and cultivating mindsets for learning and experimentation: International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021. Gaia, 30(3), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.3.17

  • Benighaus, C., & Beecroft, R. (2021a). International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021. TATuP - Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 30(3), 82–83. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.30.3.82

  • Benighaus, C., & Beecroft, R. (2021b). International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021 Gegendarstellung. 82–83.

  • Bergmann, M. (2021). Ein Projekt beginnen: Konzeptionelle und methodische Hinweise für Transdisziplinäre Forschung in Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. In M. Niederberger & E. Finne (Eds.), Forschungsmethoden in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. Springer VS. http://www.isoe-publikationen.de/publikationen/publikation-detail/?tx_refman_pi1%5Brefman%5D=2255&tx_refman_pi1%5Bcontroller%5D=Refman&tx_refman_pi1%5Baction%5D=detail&cHash=29d4959a4d7b2d01f717812739a13a99

  • Bergmann, M., Schäpke, N., Marg, O., Stelzer, F., Lang, D. J., Bossert, M., Gantert, M., Häußler, E., Marquardt, E., Piontek, F. M., Potthast, T., Rhodius, R., Rudolph, M., Ruddat, M., Seebacher, A., & Sußmann, N. (2021). Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: Success factors and methods for change. Sustainability Science, 16(2), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8

  • Biggs, R., Vos, A. de, Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (2021). The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods for Social-Ecological Systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339

  • Böcker, M., Brüggemann, henning, Christ, M., Knak, A., Lage, J., & Sommer, B. (2021). Wie wird weniger genug? Suffizienz als Strategie für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. oekom. https://www.oekom.de/buch/wie-wird-weniger-genug-9783962382766?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oekom-NL+%7C+2021-01-02

  • Boor, I., Gerritsen, D., de Greef, L., & Rodermans, J. (2021). Meaningful Assessment in Interdisciplinary Education | a practical handbook for university teachers. Amsterdam University Press. https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789463729048/meaningful-assessment-in-interdisciplinary-education

  • Boser, L. N., & Schlegel, L. M. (2021). Mit Umweltethik gegen Pandemien: Warum Tierrechte und Naturschutz auch den Menschen nutzen. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.2.4

  • Botha, W. (2021). Cooperative Learning: Building Cooperative skills and attitudes in Learners. Academia Letters. https://www.academia.edu/50819776/Cooperative_Learning_Building_Cooperative_skills_and_attitudes_in_Learners

  • Breu, T., Bergöö, M., Ebneter, L., Pham-Truffert, M., Bieri, S., Messerli, P., Ott, C., & Bader, C. (2021). Where to begin? Defining national strategies for implementing the 2030 Agenda: The case of Switzerland. Sustainability Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00856-0

  • Camponovo, S., Monnet, N., Moody, Z., & Darbellay, F. (2021). Research with children from a transdisciplinary perspective: Coproduction of knowledge by walking. Children’s Geographies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2021.2017405

  • Collado-Ruano, J., Segovia-Sarmiento, J., & Silva-Amino, D. (2021). Education, poverty, and gender: An intercultural and decolonial analysis in the Andean region. Cadernos de Pesquisa, 51. https://doi.org/10.1590/198053147248

  • Costa, L. M. (2021). Peer-reviewed article in process of publication in the African Journal of Governance and Public Leadership -transdisciplinarity applied to Public Administration. December. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356782143_Peer-reviewed_article_in_process_of_publication_in_the_African_Journal_of_Governance_and_Public_Leadership_-transdisciplinarity_applied_to_Public_Administration

  • Da Silva Guimarães Martins Da Costa, L. (2021). DRAFT LEARNING FROM MYTHOLOGY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS. APPLIED TRANSDISCIPLINARITY FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY AND HEALTH. https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/

  • Da Silva Guimaraes Martins da Costa, L. (2021). LEARNING FROM MYTHOLOGY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS. APPLIED TRANSDISCIPLINARITY FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY AND HEALTH. https://ciret-transdisciplinarity.org/

  • Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., & Louviot, M. (2021). L’école autrement? Les pédagogies alternatives en débat. https://www.alphil.com/l-ecole-autrement-les-pedagogies-alternatives-en-debat.html

  • del Cerro Santamaría, G. (2021). Complexity, Alliances and Circuits in Research across Cultures: The Case of Transdisciplinary Global Urbanism. International Journal of Recent Innovations in Academic Research, 5(2). https://www.ijriar.com/index.php/ijriar/article/view/6

  • Deutsch, L., Belcher, B., Claus, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2021). Leading inter- and transdisciplinary research: Lessons from applying theories of change to a strategic research program. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.009

  • Dreyer, M., Bergmann, M., Marg, O., Ober, S., & Sellke, P. (2021). Too big not to fail? On the design and execution of inter? On transdisciplinary research using the example of the large-scale project ENavi. GAIA, 30(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.30.1.7

  • Elizéon, I., & Riera, F. (2021). Dynamiques transdiscipinaires, relations et mondes vécus. Une approche arts et sciences du projet TranSborder. Plastir, 63, 9–32.

  • Eppinger, E. (2021). How Open Innovation Practices Deliver Societal Benefits. Sustainability, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031431

  • Estrada-García, A., Collado-Ruano, J., Del Río Fernández, J. L., & Zambrano, F. T. (2021). The transdisciplinary approach of the curriculum to promote social equity in Higher Education Institutions in Ecuador. Praxis Educativa, 16, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.16.18336.076

  • Fernández González, C., Ollivier, G., & Bellon, S. (2021). Transdisciplinarity in agroecology: Practices and perspectives in Europe. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 45(4), 523–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2020.1842285

  • Fischer, C., & Stiess, I. (2021). The role of consumers: Social participation beyond work and the market. In Post-Growth Work: Employment and meaningful activities within planetary boundaries (pp. 57–71). Routlege. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003187370-8/role-consumers-corinna-fischer-immanuel-stieß

  • Fletcher, I., Lyall, C., & Wallace, D. (2021). Pathways to Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research: The SHAPE-ID Toolkit. www.shapeid.eu

  • Flore, M. (Hrsg. ), Kröcher, U. (Hrsg. ), & Czycholl, C. (Hrsg. ). (2021). Unterwegs zur neuen Mobilität. Perspektiven für Verkehr, Umwelt und Arbeit (M. Flore, U. Kröcher, & C. Czycholl, Eds.). oekom verlag. https://doi.org/10.14512/9783962388249

  • Fraude, C., Bruhn, T., Stasiak, D., Wamsler, C., Mar, K., Schäpke, N., Schroeder, H., & Lawrence, M. (2021). Creating space for reflection and dialogue: Examples of new modes of communication for empowering climate action. GAIA, 30(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.3.9

  • Fraysshines, J., & Galaup, M. (2021). Styles et stratégies d’enseignement dans les universités et les grandes écoles. Présences, 15, 25–49.

  • Freinhardt, J. (2021). Draußen ist es anders. Auf neuen Wegen zu einer Wissenschaft für den Wandel. https://www.oekom.de/buch/draussen-ist-es-anders-9783962382964?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oekom+NL+%7C+2021-03-04

  • GAIA. (2021). Communication and the climate crisis. In GAIA. bekomm. https://www.oekom.de/ausgabe/communication-and-the-climate-crisis-80842?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oekom-NL+%7C+2021-10-28

  • Gertschen, A. (2021). Transdisciplinary research partnerships with business and civil society in the North-South context Opportunities and risks for researchers and funding institutions in Switzerland. Swiss Academies Communications, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5761532

  • Goldberg, R. F., & Vandenberg, L. N. (2021). The science of spin: Targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 20(33). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00723-0

  • Gudowsky, N. (2021). Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation. European Journal of Futures Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00177-0

  • Hanusch, F., & Schad, M. (2021). Hydrogen research: Technology first, society second? GAIA, 30(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.30.2.5

  • Henze, J. (2021). On the scientificity of transdisciplinary research. GAIA, 30(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.30.1.8

  • Herber, J. (Hrsg. ), Staemmler, J. (Hrsg. ), & Nanz, P. (Hrsg. ). (2021). Wissenschaft im Strukturwandel. Die paradoxe Praxis engagierter Transformationsforschung. In Wissenschaft im Strukturwandel. Die paradoxe Praxis engagierter Transformationsforschung. oekom verlag. https://doi.org/10.14512/9783962388256

  • Herberg, J. (Hrsg. ), Staemmler, J. (Hrsg. ), & Nanz, P. (Hrsg. ). (2021). Wissenschaft im Strukturwandel. Die paradoxe Praxis engagierter Tranformationsforschung. oekom.

  • Herweg, K., Tribelhorn, T., Lewis, A. L., Lilian, I. P., Trechsel, J., & Steinböck, C. (2021). Transdisciplinary Learning for Sustainable Development.

  • Herweg, K., Tribelhorn, T., Lewis, A. L., Providoli, I., Trechsel, L. J., & Steinböck, C. (2021). Transdisciplinary Learning for Sustainable Development: Sharing Experience in Course and Curriculum Design.

  • Hitziger, M., Berezowski, J., Dürr, S., Falzon, L. C., Léchenne, M., Lushasi, K., Markosyan, T., Mbilo, C., Momanyi, K. N., Özçelik, R., Prejit, N., Zinsstag, J., & Rüegg, S. R. (2021). System Thinking and Citizen Participation Is Still Missing in One Health Initiatives – Lessons From Fifteen Evaluations. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653398

  • Höfling, C., Hüsing Bärbel, Kimpeler, S., Lux, A., Parrisius, M., Pohsner, U., Rossmanith, E., Schirrmeister, E., Theiler, L., & Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A. (2021). Diskurse über Transformation anregen Die Nutzung von Zukunftsszenarien für partizipative Dialogformate in Museen und Schulen am Beispiel Bioökonomie (Projektverbund BioKompass, Ed.).

  • Hofmänner, A. (2021). The Role of Science in the Swiss Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo5584118

  • Honegger, M., Michaelowa, A., & Pan, J. (2021). Potential implications of solar radiation modification for achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 26(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-021-09958-1

  • Hughes, I., Byrne, E., Glatz-Schmallegger, M., Harris, C., Hynes, W., Keohane, K., & Gallachóir, B. Ó. (2021). Deep Institutional Innovation for Sustainability and Human Development. World Futures, 77(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1929013

  • Hultqvist, S., Jonsson, O., Jönson, H., & Iwarsson, S. (2021). Collaboration in Grant Proposals and Assessments in Ageing Research – Justification or a Quest for a Collaborology? Social Epistemology, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.1913769

  • Jahn, T. (2021). Transdisziplinäre Nachhaltigkeitsforschung—Methoden, Kriterien, gesellschaftliche Relevanz. In B. Blättel-Mink, S. Küster, T. Hickler, & H. Becker (Eds.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung in einer Gesellschaft des Umbruchs (pp. 141–158). Springer VS.

  • Janetschek, H. (ed), & Meyerhoff, F. (ed). (2021). Pieces of a puzzle: Towards national sustainable development advisory bodies.

  • Kahane, A., & Schein, E. (2021). Facilitating Breakthrough: How Remove to Remove Obstacles, Bridge Differences, and Move Forward Together. Barrett-Koehler Publishers. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/56219079-facilitating-breakthrough?from_search=true&from_srp=true&qid=2xoywLPVlM&rank=2

  • Kara, H. (ed), & Khoo, S. (ed). (2021). Qualitative and Digital Research in Times of Crisis. Methods, Reflexivity and Ethics. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/qualitative-and-digital-research-in-times-of-crisis

  • Kastenhofer, K., & Molyneux-Hodgson Editors, S. (2021). Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences. Spirnger. http://www.springer.com/series/6566

  • Kligyte, G., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., Leslie, J., Key, T., Hooper, B., & Salazar, E. (2021). A Partnership Outcome Spaces framework for purposeful student–staff partnerships. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1940924

  • Knak, A. (2021). WACHSTUMSTREIBER UND SUFFIZIENZHINDERNISSE AUF KOMMUNALER EBENE.

  • Kohlstadt, M.-M. (2021, December). Flughöhe. Stadtmachen Zwischen Wissenschaft Und Praxis.

  • Kondo, Y., Fujisawa, E., Ishikawa, K., Nakahara, S., Matsushita, K., Asano, S., Kamatani, K., Suetsugu, S., Kano, K., Kumazawa, T., Sato, K., & Okuda, N. (2021). Community capability building for environmental conservation in Lake Biwa (Japan) through an adaptive and abductive approach. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-021-00078-3

  • Kramm, J., & Völker, C. (2021). Wi ist ein nachhaltiger Umgang mit Plastik möglich? Eine Vorstellung der inter- und transdisziplinär arbeitenden Nachwuchsgruppe ‘PastX’. In B. Blättel-Mink, T. Hickler, S. Küster, & H. Becker (Eds.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung in einer Gesellschaft des Umbruchs (pp. 175–195). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31466-8

  • Kramm, J. & Völker Carolin. (2021). Wie ist nachhaltiger Umgang mit Plastik möglich? Eine Vorstellung der Inter- und transdisziplinär arbeitenden Nachwuchsgruppe ‘PlastX’. In B. Blättel-Mink, T. Hickler, S. Küster, & H. Becker (Eds.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung in einer Gesellschaft des Umbruchs (pp. 175–196). Springer VS.

  • Kristof, K. (2021). Erfolgsfaktoren für die gesellschaftliche Transformation. GAIA, 30(1), 5–11.

  • Lam, D. P. M., Freund, M. E., Kny, J., Marg, O., Mbah, M., Theiler, L., Bergmann, M., Brohmann, B., Lang, D. J., & Schäfer, M. (2021). Transdisciplinary research: Towards an integrative perspective. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.4.7

  • Laursen, B. K., Gonnerman, C., & Crowley, S. J. (2021). Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.02.004

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2021a). Co-production of knowledge in transdisciplinary contributions: Taking stock. Trialog 137, 2, 6–11.

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2021b). Creating Built Environments. Bridging Knowledge and Practice Divides. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Creating-Built-Environments-Bridging-Knowledge-and-Practice-Divides/Lawrence/p/book/9780815385394?gclid=CjwKCAjwuYWSBhByEiwAKd_n_gkCcQ5onSBzqSW4zIU6CZUmuR9Np6pkhpo2InWi_np5bRZJpKlbWhoCSVAQAvD_BwE

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2021c). Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Sustainable Development Goals: Human Ecology Matters.

  • Lemann, M. F., Leitzinger, C., & Morf, L. S. (2021a). Abfalltechnik. Gerber & Brechbühl. https://www.amazon.de/Abfalltechnik-2020-Martin-F-Lemann/dp/3952529745/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&qid=1626336966&refinements=p_27%3ALeo+Morf&s=books&sr=1-2

  • Lemann, M. F., Leitzinger, C., & Morf, L. S. (2021b). Waste Management. Gerber & Brechbühl. https://www.amazon.de/Waste-Management-2020-Martin-Lemann/dp/3952529702/ref=sr_1_7?dchild=1&qid=1626337207&refinements=p_27%3AMartin+F.+Lemann&s=books&sr=1-7

  • Leydensdorff, L. (2021). The Evolutionary Dynamics of Discursive Knowledge. Communication-Theoretical Perspectives on an Empirical Philosophy of Science. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-59951-5#authorsandaffiliationsbook

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Ivanova, I. (2021). The measurement of “interdisciplinarity” and “synergy” in scientific and extra‐scientific collaborations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24416

  • LIRA 2030 Africa: Key achievements and learnings (2016-2021). (2023). https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.04

  • Luetkemeier, R., Mbidzo, M., & Liehr, S. (2021). Water security and rangeland sustainability: Transdisciplinary research insights from Namibian– German collaborations. South African Journal of Science, 117(1/2). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/7773

  • Lusk, G. (2021). Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 90, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.009

  • Marcelín-Alvarado, M. A., Collado-Ruano, J., & Orozco-Malo, M. (2021). Intercultural universities in Mexico: Decolonizing the intercultural philosophy of education. Language and Intercultural Communication, 21(5), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.1935987

  • Martins da Costa, L. (2021). QUALITY OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND TRANSDISCIPLINARITY :

  • Masson, J. E., Soustre-Gacougnolle, I., Perrin, M., Schmitt, C., Henaux, M., Jaugey, C., Teillet, E., Lollier, M., Lallemand, J.-F., & Schermesser, F. (2021). Transdisciplinary participatory-action-research from questions to actionable knowledge for sustainable viticulture development. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00693-7

  • Matthys, M.-L., Acharya, S., & Khatri, S. (2021). “Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life. World Development, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105410

  • Maturana, B., Salama, A. M., & McInneny, A. (2021). Architecture, urbanism and health in a post-pandemic virtual world. Archnet-IJAR, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-02-2021-0024

  • Mehring, M., Geitmann-Mügge, K., Frick-Trzebitzky, F., & Hummel, D. (2021). Urban Social Ecology. In Urban Ecology in the Global South. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_4

  • Mokiy, V. (2021a). INFORMATION ON THE INFORMATION. SYSTEMS TRANSDISCIPLINARY ASPECT. Universum:Social Science, 71(1–2). https://doi.org/10.32743/UniSoc.2021.71.1-2.40-48

  • Mokiy, V. (2021b). INFORMATION ON THE TIME. SYSTEMS TRANSDISCIPLINARY ASPECT. Universum:Social Science, 71(1–2). https://doi.org/10.32743/unisoc.2021.71.1-2.30-39

  • Moreno Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Torrico-Vallejos, D., Aranibar, J., Mendieta-Perez, R., & Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021). Transforming higher education in Bolivia by linking two contra-hegemonic movements: Agroecology and the Decolonial turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1930259

  • Moreno-Cely, A., Cuajera-Nahui, D., Escobar-Vasquez, C. G., Vanwing, T., & Tapia-Ponce, N. (2021). Breaking monologues in collaborative research: Bridging knowledge systems through a listening-based dialogue of wisdom approach. Sustainability Science, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00937-8

  • Mountain Research and Development. (2021). 41(3). https://bioone.org/journals/mountain-research-and-development/volume-41/issue-3

  • Müller-Ferch, G. (2021). Anpassung an den Klimawandel. So gelingt die erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit. ProClim Flash, 73.

  • Nita, L., Smith, L. M., Chancellor, N., & Cramman, H. (2021). The challenge and opportunities of quantum literacy for future education and transdisciplinary problem-solving. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1920905

  • Ökologisches Wirtschaften. (2021). Zukunft gestalten (Vol. 2). oekom.

  • Osinski, A. (2021). Towards a critical sustainability science? Participation of disadvantaged actors and power relations in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031266

  • Özdamar, E. G. (2021). An Experimental Approach to Transdisciplinary Methodology in Housing. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17831/enq:arcc.v18i1.1075

  • Pasquier, F. (2021). Mobiliser la dimension du spirituel en éducation. In Leadership spirituel en pratiques (pp. 295–301). EMS Editions. https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.voynn.2021.01.0295

  • Peukert, D., Lam, D. P. M., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., & Lang, D. J. (2021). Facilitating collaborative processes in transdisciplinary research using design prototyping. Journal of Design Research, 18(5–6), 294–326. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2020.118673

  • Peukert, D., & Vilsmaier, U. (2021). Collaborative design prototyping in transdisciplinary research: An approach to heterogeneity and unknowns. Futures, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102808

  • Phillips, R., & Kara, H. (2021). Creative Writing for Social Research. A Practical Guide. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-writing-for-social-research

  • Pinheiro, S. L., & Pasquier, F. (2021). Social Environmental Inequalities in France When Facing Covid-19 Health Crisis. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 12, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.22545/2021/00150

  • Plastir. (2021a). Plastir. 63(12).

  • Plastir. (2021b). 63. http://www.plasticites-sciences-arts.org/plastir-n63-12-2021/

  • Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., & Fam, D. (2021). Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science & Policy, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005

  • Prell, C., Miller Hesed, C. D., Johnson, K., Paolisso, M., Teodoro, J. D., & Van Dolah, E. (2021). Transdisciplinarity and Shifting Network Boundaries: The Challenges of Studying an Evolving Stakeholder Network in Participatory Settings. Fields Methods, 33(4), 405–416.

  • R3GIS. (2021). Layman’s Report. LIFE URBANGREEN. Innovative technological platform to improve management of green areas for better climate adaptation.

  • Rat für nachhaltige Entwicklung & Leopoldina. (2021). Klimaneutralität. Optionen für eine ambitionierte Weichenstellung und Umsetzung.

  • Rat für nachhaltige Entwicklung & Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina. (2021). Positionspapier—Klimaneutralität: Optionen für eine ambitionierte Weichenstellung und Umsetzung.

  • Renn, O. (2021). Transdisciplinarity: Synthesis towards a modular approach. Futures, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102744

  • Richerzhagen, C., & Tydecks, L. (2021). Gesellschaft und Biodiversität. Mit der Forschungsinitiative zum Erhalt der Artenvielfalt Biodiversität wertschätzen und sichern. GAIA, 30(3), 207–208. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.30.3.16

  • Rigolot, C. (2021). Organizing and better understanding transdisciplinarity in the context of artificial intelligence expansion: A crucial role for the new alliance between economics and engineering | Enhanced Reader. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 48, 615–620.

  • Rodier, C., Galaleldin, M., Boudreau, J., Anis, H., & Peyton, L. (2021). STEAM – Arts Integration Frameworks for Transdisciplinarity. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14918

  • Rogga, S., & Zscheischler, J. (2021). Opportunities, balancing acts, and challenges—Doing PhDs in transdisciplinary research projects. Environmental Science & Policy, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.009

  • Rolland, B. (ed), Cross, J. E. (ed), Hohl, S. D. (ed), Johnson, L. J. (ed), Wooten, K. (ed), & Brasier, A. R. (ed). (2021). Team Science Interventions in Clinical and Translational Research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-clinical-and-translational-science/thematic-issues/team-science-interventions-in-clinical-and-translational-research

  • Roschweitz, A., Björnsen, A., & Morf, P. (2021). Reframing Knowledge & Technology Transfer | 30 Tools & Recommendations for SWEET 3. www.bfe.admin.chPhone+41584625611·Fax+41584632500·contact@bfe.admin.ch·www.bfe.admin.ch

  • Rudow, A., & Bugmann, H. (2021). Waldlabor zürich—The zurich forest lab- The living laboratory for applied research and comprehensive knowledge transfer on forest topics takes shape. GAIA, 30(3), 200–203. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.3.14

  • Saric, J., Käser, F., Lys, J.-A., Utzinger, J., & Breu, T. (2021). Synergising Research and Service Activities at Swiss Research Institutions to Accelerate Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179626

  • Scherhaufer, P. (2021). Better research through more participation? The future of integrated climate change assessments. Futures, 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102661

  • Schmidt, J. C. (2021a). Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315387109

  • Schmidt, J. C. (2021b). Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity Studies in Science, Society and Sustainability.

  • Schmohl, T., & Philipp, T. (2021). Handbuch Transdisziplinäre Didaktik.

  • Schneider, F., & Tribaldos, T. (2021). Finding ways to sustainability through the ‘network compass’. https://doi.org/10.48350/149709

  • Schneider, F., Tribaldos, T., Adler, C., Biggs, R. (Oonsie), de Bremond, A., Buser, T., Krug, C., Loutre, M.-F., Moore, S., Norström, A. V., Paulavets, K., Urbach, D., Spehn, E., Wülser, G., & Zondervan, R. (2021). Co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: A strategic compass for global research networks. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.007

  • Scholz, R. W. (Hrsg. ), Albrecht, E. (Hrsg. ), Marx, D. (Hrsg. ), Mißler-Behr, M. (Hrsg. ), Renn, O. (Hrsg. ), & Van Zyl-Bulitta, V. (Hrsg. ). (2021). Supplementarische Informationen zum DiDaT Weißbuch. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912125

  • Scholz, R. W. (Hrsg. ), Beckedahl, M. (Hrsg. ), Noller, S. (Hrsg. ), & Renn, O. (Hrsg. ). (2021). DiDaT Weißbuch. Verantwortungsvoller Umgang  mit digitalen Daten—Orientierungen eines transdisziplinären Prozesses (R. W. Scholz, M. Beckedahl, S. Noller, & O. Renn, Eds.). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748924111

  • Schröner, C., Kirchhoff, E., Riedel, M., Aichele, M., Knoll, K., Schuldt-Baumgart, N., & Stieß, I. (2021). Bratan du zählst. Nachhaltiger Konsum und soziale Teilhabe für prekäre Zielgruppen.

  • Schwarz, R. M., & Bennett, L. M. (2021). Team effectiveness model for science (TEMS): Using a mutual learning shared mindset to design, develop, and sustain science teams. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.824

  • SEA-EU. (2021). Strategies of Stakeholder Engagement. Mapping and Analysis of Approaches and Strategies within the SEA-EU Alliance. [s. n.].

  • Searle, M., Ahn, C., Fels, L., & Carbone, K. (2021). Illuminating Transformative Learning/Assessment: Infusing Creativity, Reciprocity, and Care Into Higher Education. Journal of Transformative Education, 19(4), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/15413446211045160

  • SFOE. (2021). Reframing Knowledge & Technology Transfer | 30 Tools & Recommendations for SWEET 3. www.bfe.admin.chPhone+41584625611·Fax+41584632500·contact@bfe.admin.ch·www.bfe.admin.ch

  • Shape-ID. (2021a). Annotated Bibliography Collection o Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research and AHSS Integration. 822705.

  • SHAPE-ID. (2021a). SHAPE-ID Toolkit Resources—Annotated Bibliography collection. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4743690

  • SHAPE-ID. (2021b). SHAPE-ID Toolkit Resources—Case Studies Collection. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4743691

  • Shape-ID. (2021b). The SHAPE-ID Toolkit: Overview, trajectories, and user guidance. https://zenodo.org/record/5532720#.Ya-PYS24jBJ

  • Skelton, M. (2021). Orders of Social Science: Understanding Social-Scientific Controversies and Confluence on What “High-Quality” Knowledge and “Good” Adaptation Is. Frontiers in Climate, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.589265

  • Stützel, E. (2021). Der Gemeinschaftskompass. Eine Orientierungshilfe für kollektives Leben und Arbeiten. oekom. https://www.oekom.de/buch/der-gemeinschaftskompass-9783962382988?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oekom-NL+%7C+2021-04-01

  • Szostak, R. (2021). Making Sense of the Future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186854

  • Tengö, M., Austin, B. J., Danielsen, F., & Fernández-Llamazares, Á. (2021). Creating Synergies between Citizen Science and Indigenous and Local Knowledge. BioScience, 71(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab023

  • Thompson Klein, J. (2021). Beyond Interdisciplinarity. Boundary Work, Communication, and Collaboration. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/beyond-interdisciplinarity-9780197571156?cc=ch&lang=en&

  • Transdisciplinary Insights. (2021a). Transdisciplinary Insights. Transdisciplinary Insights, 5(1).

  • Transdisciplinary Insights. (2021b). Transdisciplinary Insights, 5(1). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/leuven/ti/2021/00000005/00000001#expand/collapse

  • Trechsel, L. J., Zimmermann, A. B., Steinböck, C., Breu, T., Herweg, K., & Thieme, S. (2021). Safe spaces for disruptive learning in a north–south research partnership context: International mobility of doctoral students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042413

  • Trechsel, L., Steinböck, C., Azeri Ogalleh, S., Zimmermann, A., Herweg, K., Breu, T., & Lannen, A. (2021). Wissen und Kompetenzen für Nachhaltigkeit durch partnerschaftliche Forschung und Bildung. CDE. www.bene-unibe.ch

  • Tribaldos, T., & Schneider, F. (2021). Enabling Players to Develop Theories of Change for Sustainable Development: A Serious Game. Simulation & Gaming, 52(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781211022399

  • USYS TdLab & td-net. (2022). International Transdisciplinarity Conference 2021. Creating Spaces and Cultivating Mindsets for Learning and Experimentation. Conference Report. www.transdisciplinarity.ch

  • van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., Kligyte, G., & Key, T. (2021). A Co-evolutionary, Transdisciplinary Approach to Innovation in Complex Contexts: Improving University Well-Being, a Case Study. She JI: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7(4), 565–588.

  • van der Tuin, I., & Zuurmond, A. (2021). Serres on Education. William Temple Foundation. https://williamtemplefoundation.org.uk/temple-tracts/temple-continental/

  • Vega, K. A., Schläpfer-Miller, J., & Kueffer, C. (2021). Discovering the wild side of urban plants through public engagement. Plants People Planet, 3(4), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10191

  • Vienni Baptista, B. (2021). Reconfiguring interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary spaces for Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences integration | Reconfigurando espaços interdisciplinares e transdisciplinares para a integração das Artes, Humanidades e Ciências Sociais. EducaOnline, 15(2).

  • Volk, S. C. (2021). Comparative Communication Research. A Study of the Conceptual, Methodological, and Social Challenges of International Collaborative Studies in Communication Science Studies in International, Transnational and Global Communications. Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/bookseries/15233

  • Wamsler, C., Osberg, G., Osika, W., Herndersson, H., & Mundaca, L. (2021). Linking internal and external transformation for sustainability and climate action: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Global Environmental Change, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102373

  • Wanner, M., Bernert, P., Fischer, N., & Schmitt, M. (2021a). Creación de espacios de aprendizaje y enseñanza para la investigación transformadora y transdisciplinar: El Laboratorio de Innovación Transformadora. DIDAC, 78 JUL-DIC, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.48102/didac.2021..78_jul-dic.80

  • Wanner, M., Bernert, P., Fischer, N., & Schmitt, M. (2021b). Creating Learning and Teaching Spaces for Transformative and Transdisciplinary Research: The Transformative Innovation Lab. DIDAC, 78 JUL-DIC, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.48102/didac.2021..78_jul-dic.83

  • Weith, T., Barkmann, T., Gaasch, N., Rogga, S., Strauß, C., & Zscheischler, J. (2021). Sustainable Land Management in a European Context. A Co-Design Approach. Springer. http://www.springer.com/series/8599

  • Wernli, D., Clausin, M., Antulov-Fantulin, N., Berezowski, J., Biller, N., Blanchet, K., Böttcher, L., Burton-Jeangros, C., Escher, G., Flahault, A., Fukuda, K., Helbing, D., Jaffé, P. D., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., Kaspiarovich, Y., Krishnakumar, J., Lawrence, R. J., Lee, K., Léger, A., … Young, O. (2021). Building a multisystemic understanding of societal resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Global Health, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006794

  • Westenhöfer, J. (Hrsg. ), Busch, S. (Hrsg. ), Pohlan, J. (Hrsg. ), von dem Knesebeck, O. (Hrsg. ), & Swart, E. (Hrsg. ). (2021). Gesunde Quartiere. Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention im städtischen Kontext. oekom. https://www.oekom.de/buch/gesunde-quartiere-9783962383060?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oekom-NL+%7C+2021-07-01

  • Westermann, J. R., Bolsius, J., Kunze, S., Schünemann, C., Sinning, H., Ziemann, A., Baldin, M.-L., Brüggemann, K., Brzoska, P., Ehnert, F., Goldberg, V., Großmann, L., Grunewald, K., Naumann, T., Reinfried, F., Richter, B., Spohr, G., & Ortlepp, R. (2021). Hitzeanpassung von Stadtquartieren: Akteursperspektiven und Umsetzungsansätze. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 30(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.30.4.9

  • Will, M., Dressler, G., Kreuer, D., Thulke, H., Grêt‐Regamey, A., & Müller, B. (2021). How to make socio‐environmental modelling more useful to support policy and management? People and Nature, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10207

  • Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: Fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y

  • Wuelser, G., Adler, C., Breu, T., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Wiesmann, U., & Pohl, C. (2021). On which common ground to build? Transferable knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-01010-0

  • Zürich, C. S. C. (2021). Practicing Citizen Science in Zurich Handbook. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-207987 Published

  • Abreu, J. G. (2020). Lima de Freitas e Raymond Abellio. A arte de Lima de Freitas e a gnose de Raymond Abellio.

  • Aguilar Gordón, F. (Co. ). (2020). Filosofía de la innovación y de la tecnología educativa: Tomo II Innovación educativa.

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. (2020). Forschung für gesellschaftliche Innovationen an Fachhochschulen (FHs). 15(12). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4090403

  • Arnott, J., Russell, P., Bath, S., Bednarek, A., Combest-Friedman, C., Fisher, L., George, D., Hudson, C., Maillard, L., Moser, S., Read, J., Seitzinger, S., Soberal, N., Teicher, H., & Zycherman, A. (2020). Collaborative Research in a Virtual World: Implications of COVID-19 for the Co-Production of Environmental Knowledge and Solutions.

  • Assmuth, T., Chen, X., Degeling, C., Haahtela, T., Irvine, K. N., Keune, H., Kock, R., Rantala, S., Rüegg, S., & Vikström, S. (2020). Integrative concepts and practices of health in transdisciplinary social ecology. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-019-00038-y

  • Augenstein, K., Bachmann, B., Egermann, M., Hermelingmeier, V., Hilger, A., Jaeger-Erben, M., Kessler, A., Lam, D. P. M., Palzkill, A., Suski, P., & von Wirth, T. (2020). From niche to mainstream: The dilemmas of scaling up sustainable alternatives. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.3.3

  • Bammer, G. (2020). Expertise in research integration and implementation for tackling complex problems: When is it needed, where can it be found, and how can it be strengthened? Palgrave Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0380-0

  • Baumber, A., Kligyte, G., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M., & Pratt, S. (2020). Learning together: A transdisciplinary approach to student–staff partnerships in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1684454

  • Beck, S., & Forsyth, T. (2020). Who gets to imagine transformative change? Participation and representation in biodiversity assessments. Environmental Conservation, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892920000272

  • Beer, A., Henke, J., & Pasternack, P. (2020). Integrieren und kommunizieren Leitfaden und Toolboxen zur koordinativen Begleitung von Forschungsverbünden und Förderprogrammen. Institut für Hochschulforschung (HoF).

  • Beutller, C. ;, & Paschke, M. (2020). Risk and uncertainty communication. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000340471

  • Binder, C. R., Fritz, L., Hansmann, R., Balthasaar, A., & Roose, Z. (2020). Increasing the relevance of science for practice and practice for science: Quantitative empirical insights. Science and Public Policy, 47(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa066

  • Böcker, M., Brüggemann, H., Christ, M., Knak, A., Lage, J., & Sommer, B. (2020). Wie wird weniger genug? In Wie wird weniger genug? oekom verlag München. https://doi.org/10.14512/9783962388041

  • Bonn, A. (2016). Grünbuch Citizen Science Strategie 2020 für Deutschland. BürGEr schaffen WISSen – Wissen schafft Bürger (GEWISS).

  • Borie, M., Gustafsson, K. M., Obermeister, N., Turnhout, E., & Bridgewater, P. (2020). Institutionalising reflexivity? Transformative learning and the Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environmental Science and Policy, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.005

  • Bornemann, B., & Christen, M. (2020). Navigating between Complexity and Control in Transdisciplinary Problem Framing. Meaning Making as an Approach to Reflexive Integration. Social Epistemology, 1–13.

  • Bornemann, B., Förster, R., Zurich, E., & Kläy, A. (2020). Sustainability-Oriented Transformative Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Eight Propositions on Challenges and Approaches. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344413144

  • Böschen, S., Legris, M., Pfersdorf, S., & Stahl, B. C. (2020). Identity politics: Participatory research and its challenges related to social and epistemic control. Social Epistemology, 1–13.

  • Bührmann, A. D., & Franke, Y. (2020). Transdisziplinär und transformative Forschung: Reallabore in der Praxis. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 21(3).

  • Chassé, P., Cogos, S., & Fouqueray, T. (2020). La thèse interdisciplinaire en sciences de l’environnement, des défis à relever et des opportunités à saisir: Regards de doctorants. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2020037

  • Chenorkian, R. (2020). Conception et mise en œuvre de l’interdisciplinarité dans les Observatoires hommes-milieux (OHM, CNRS). Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021002

  • Collado Ruano, J., Falconí Benitez, F., & Malo Larrea, A. (2020). Educación ambiental y praxis intercultural desde la filosofía ancestral del Sumak Kawsay. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(90), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3872522

  • Collado-Ruano, J., Carapás Aguilar, P. L., & Riera Astudillo, J. G. (2020). Pedagogías artísticas y praxis interculturales: El cine documental como herramienta didáctica para la innovación educativa. Opción, 92, 455–485.

  • Collado-Ruano, J., Ojeda, M. N., Malo, M. O., & Amino, D. S. (2020). Educação, artes e interculturalidade. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2020.25639

  • Côté, I., Lavoie, K., & Trottier, R.-P. (2020). La recherche centrée sur l’enfant. Défis éthiques et innovations méthodologiques. https://www.pulaval.com/produit/la-recherche-centree-sur-l-enfant-defis-ethiques-et-innovations-methodologiques

  • Crowe, S., Adebajo, A., Esmael, H., Denegri, S., Martin, A., McAlister, B., Moore, B., Quinn, M., Rennard, U., Simpson, J., Wray, P., & Yeeles, P. (2020). ‘All hands-on deck’, working together to develop UK standards for public involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00229-y

  • Dannecker, P. (2020). Transdisciplinarity ‘Meets’ Power Structures: Challenges and Experiences of a Capacity Building Project on Transdisciplinarity. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0042

  • Darbellay, F. (2020a). L’érudition: Faire du neuf avec du vieux? Interdisciplinarité, polymathie, indiscipline. Hermès, La Revue, 2(87). https://www.cairn.info/revue-hermes-la-revue-2020-2-page-205.htm?contenu=resume

  • Darbellay, F. (2020b). Serendipity. In Encyclopedia of Creativity. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.23791-7

  • Debono, M.-W. (2020). Electrome & Cognition Modes in Plants: A Transdisciplinary Approach to the Eco-Sensitiveness of the World. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.22545/2020/00143

  • Deffner, J., & Stein, M. (2020). Daseinsvorsorge trifft Alltag. Wie Kommunen, Zivilgesellschaft und intermediäre Akteure durch Kooperation und Co-Produktion die Lebensqualität vor Ort verbessern können. www.kommunen-innovativ.de/lebenswert

  • Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2020a). Inter- und Transdisziplinarität ausbuchstabiert: Reflexionen zum angemessenen Umgang mit der Vielfalt an Gegenständen und fachlichen Zugängen in komplexen Forschungsfeldern. In Ernährungskommunikation. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27315-6_4-1

  • Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2020b). Science policy recommendations for funding real-world laboratories and comparable formats. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.1.14

  • Di Giulio, A., & Defila, R. (2020). Charakterisierung eines kompakten, transdisziplinären und transformationsorientierten Dialogformats für die Bearbeitung von Nachhaltigkeitsthemen.

  • Dravet, F., Pasquier, F., Collado, J., & Castro, G. (2020). TRANSDISCIPLINARIEDAD y Educación del Futuro.

  • Drexler, C., Braun, V., Christie, D., Claramunt, B., Dax, T., Jelen, I., Kanka, R., Katsoulakos, N., Le Roux, G., Price, M., Scheurer, T., & R., W. (2016). Mountains for Europe‘s Future – A strategic research agenda An input to the Horizon 2020 Work Programmes and Calls 2018–2020 April 2016.

  • Duncan, R., Robson-Williams, M., & Fam, D. (2020). Assessing research impact potential: Using the transdisciplinary Outcome Spaces Framework with New Zealand’s National Science Challenges. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2020.1713825

  • Ebert, B., Schramm, E., & Winker, M. (2020). Gemeinsam Innovations-entscheidungen identifizieren. Methoden und Konzepte für Stakeholderdialoge und die Entwicklung sektorübergreifender Kooperationsmodelle am Beispiel landwirtschaftlicher Wasserwiederverwendung. ISOE.

  • Einsiedel, S. (2020). Partizipation als Antwort auf Armut und Klimawandel? Armuts- und Teilhabeforschung auf den Spuren von Amartya Sen und Papst Franziskus. https://www.oekom.de/buch/partizipation-als-antwort-auf-armut-und-klimawandel-9783962382445

  • Engbers, M. (2020). Kultur und Differenz. Transdisziplinäre Nachhaltigkeitsforschung gestalten. Wahrnehmungsgeographische Studien.

  • Erazo Acosta, E. (2020). Alli Kawsay: Epistemology and Political Practice in the Territories, a Possibility from the Andean Pluriverse for Ecological Justice and the Care of Mother Nature. In The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_41-1

  • Estrada Garía, A. (2020). Los principios de la complejidad y su aporte al proceso de enseñanza. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 28(109). https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-40362020002801893

  • Fam, D., Clarke, E., Freeth, R., Derwort, P., Klaniecki, K., Kater‐Wettstädt, L., Juarez‐Bourke, S., Hilser, S., Peukert, D., & Meyer, E. (2020). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research and practice: Balancing expectations of the ‘old’academy with the future model of universities as ‘problem solvers’. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(1), 19–34.

  • Fam, D., & O’Rourke, M. (2020). Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures. Lessons Learned from Cautionary Tales. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Interdisciplinary-and-Transdisciplinary-Failures-Lessons-Learned-from-Cautionary/Fam-ORourke/p/book/9780367207038

  • Fischer, A., & Handke, H. (2020). Vom schwierigen Vergnügen, sich in der wissenschaftlichen Lehrerbildung zwischen verschiedenen Welten des Denkens und Handelns zu bewegen. In Grenzen überschreiten, Pluralismus wagen—Perspektiven sozioökonomischer Hochschullehre (pp. 291–314). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-29642-1_15

  • Foshag, K., Aeschbach, N., Höfle, B., Winkler, R., Siegmund, A., & Aeschbach, W. (2020). Viability of public spaces in cities under increasing heat: A transdisciplinary approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102215

  • Frank-Job, B. (Hrsg. ), & Michael, J. (Hrsg. ). (2020). Angstsprachen. Interdisziplinäre Zusammenhänge zur kommunikativen Auseinandersetzung mit Angst. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658301798

  • Franz, H.-W. (Hrsg. ), Beck, G. (Hrsg. ), Compagna, D. (Hrsg. ), Dürr, D. (Hrsg. ), Gera, W. (Hrsg. ), & Wegner, M. (Hrsg. ). (2020). Nachhaltig Leben und Wirtschaften. Management Sozialer Innovationen als Gestaltung gesellschaftlicher Transformation. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658293789

  • Freeth, R., & Caniglia, G. (2020). Learning to collaborate while collaborating: Advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 15, 247–261.

  • Freeth, R., & Vilsmaier, U. (2020). Researching Collaborative Interdisciplinary Teams: Practices and Principles for Navigating Researcher Positionality. Science & Technology Studies, 33(3), 57–72.

  • Fridrich, C., & Hedtke Walter Otto Ötsch Hrsg, R. (2020). Grenzen überschreiten, Pluralismus wagen-Perspektiven sozioökonomischer Hochschullehre Sozioökonomische Bildung und Wissenschaft. Springer VS. http://www.springer.com/series/15818

  • Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. European Journal of Futures Research, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4

  • Fritz, L., & Meinherz, F. (2020). Tracing power in transdisciplinary sustainability research: An exploration. GAIA, 29(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.29.1.9

  • Gibbs, P., & Beavis, A. (2020). Contemporary Thinking on Transdisciplinary Knowledge. What Thos Who Know, Know. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-030-39785-2

  • Graf, E.-M., & Ukowitz, M. (2020). Transdisziplinarität in der Coaching-Prozessforschung – Neue Wege der Zusammenarbeit. Coaching | Theorie & Praxis, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1365/s40896-020-00035-z

  • Grunwald, A., Schäfer, M., & Bergmann, M. (2020). New formats of transdisciplinary research. Creating differentiated bridges between science and practice GAIA 29/2 (2020): 106—114. GAIA, 29(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.29.2.8

  • Guevara Pedemonte, N., & Riera Gil, E. (2020). The EAPC Research Driver programme: Fostering better policies through knowledge transfer between academia, public administration and society (pp. 24–53).

  • Haller, T., & Zingerli, C. (2020). Towards Shared Research—Participatory and Integrative Approaches in Researching African Environments.

  • Heigl, F., Kieslinger, B., Paul, K. T., Uhlik, J., Frigerio, D., & Dörler, D. (2020). Co-creating and implementing quality criteria for citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/CSTP.294

  • Herberg, J., & Vilsmaier, U. (2020). Social and Epistemic Control in Collaborative Research—Reconfiguring the Interplay of Politics and Methodology. Social Epistemiology, 34(4), 309–318.

  • Hodgson, A. (2020). Systems Thinking for a Turbulent World. A Search for New Perspectives. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Systems-Thinking-for-a-Turbulent-World-A-Search-for-New-Perspectives/Hodgson/p/book/9781138598676

  • Horcea-Milcu, A. I., Martín-López, B., Lam, D. P. M., & Lang, D. J. (2020). Research pathways to foster transformation: Linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research. Ecology and Society, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11332-250113

  • International Science Council. (2020a). Advancing the 2030 Agenda in African Cities Through Knowledge Co-Production. Urban experiments led by early-career African Scientists. https://doi.org/10.24948/2020.01

  • International Science Council. (2020b, June 1). Promoting Indigenous knowledge and values for more sustainable water resource management. Transformations to Sustainability, 44, 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.006

  • Ison, R., & Straw, E. (2020). The Hidden Power of Systems Thinking. Governance in a Climate Emergency. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Hidden-Power-of-Systems-Thinking-Governance-in-a-Climate-Emergency/Ison-Straw/p/book/9781138493995

  • ITB infoservice. (2020). Wissenstransfer im Wandel. Brückenbau zwischen Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft.

  • Jacobi, J., Llanque, A., Bieri, S., Birachi, E., Cochard, R., Depetris Chauvin, N., Diebold, C., Eschen, R., Frosssard, E., Guillaume, T., Jaquet, S., Kämpfen, F., Kenis, M., Kiba, D. I., Komarudin, H., Madrazo, J., Manoli, G., Mukhovi, S. M., Nguyen, V. T. H., … Robledo-Abad, C. (2020). Utilization of research knowledge in sustainable development pathways: Insights from a transdisciplinary research-for-development programme. Environmental Science & Policy, 103, 21–29.

  • Jagannathan, K., Arnott, J. C., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., Mach, K. J., Moss, R. H., & Dana Sjostrom, K. (2020). Great expectations? Reconciling the aspiration, outcome, and possibility of co-production. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 22–29.

  • Jahn, T. (2020). Kritische Transdisziplinarität und die Frage der Transformation. ISOE-Diskussionspapiere, 46. https://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2018-12/klimawandel-kohlekommission-un-klimagipfel-hitze-

  • Jahn, T., Hummel, D., Drees, L., Liehr, S., Lux, A., Mehring, M., Stieß, I., Völker, C., Winker, M., & Zimmermann, M. (2020). Sozial-ökologische Gestaltung im Anthropozän. GAIA, 29(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.29.2.6

  • Juerges, N., & Jahn, S. (2020). German forest management stakeholders at the science-society interface: Their views on problem definition, knowledge production and research utilisation. Forest Policy and Economics, 111. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1389934118303186?via%3Dihub

  • Kara, H. (2020). Creative Research Methods. A Practical Guide. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/creative-research-methods

  • Kara, H., & Khoo, S. (2020a). Researching in the Age of COVID-19: Volume 1: Response and Reassessment. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/researching-in-the-age-of-covid-19

  • Kara, H., & Khoo, S. (2020b). Researching in the Age of COVID-19: Volume 3: Creativity and Ethics. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/researching-in-the-age-of-covid-1

  • Kara, H., & Khoo, S. (2020c). Researching in the Age of COVID-19: Volume II: Care and Resilience. Policy Press. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/researching-in-the-age-of-covid-2

  • Kora, K. (2020). Wie Transformation gelingt. Erfolgsfaktoren für den gesellschaftlichen Wandel. 216.

  • Koseki, S. A., Jaques, L., & Sartoretti, I. (2020). De l’espace pour l’école de la réussite. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3773955

  • Krieger, K., Hietanen, O., Núria Guevara, F., Riera, E., Diana Escobar, C., & Paula Adam, C. (2020). European Public Mosaic BRIDGING SCIENCE AND POLICYMAKING ARTICLES.

  • Kristof, K. (2020). Wie Transformation gelingt. Erfolgsfaktoren für den gesellschaftlichen Wandel. https://www.oekom.de/buch/wie-transformation-gelingt-9783962381325

  • Laasch, O., Moosmayer, D., Antonacopoulou, E., & Schaltegger, S. (2020). Constellations of Transdisciplinary Practices: A Map and Research Agenda for the Responsible Management Learning Field. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04440-5

  • Lam, D. P. M., Hinz, E., Lang, D. J., Tengö, M., von Wehrden, H., & Martín-López, B. (2020). Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: A literature review. Ecology and Society, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103

  • Lam, D. P. M., Horcea-Milcu, A. I., Fischer, J., Peukert, D., & Lang, D. J. (2020). Three principles for co-designing sustainability intervention strategies: Experiences from Southern Transylvania. Ambio, 49(9), 1451–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01302-x

  • Lawrence, R. (2020). Advancing with Transdisciplinarity: Effective Responses for Coronavirus. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.22545/2020/00141

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2020). Creating Built Environment. Bridging Knowledge and Practice Divides. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Creating-Built-Environments-Bridging-Knowledge-and-Practice%20Divides/Lawrence/p/book/9780815385394

  • Lieu, J., Martínez-Reyes, A., Groome, P., Mangalagiu, D., Pearce, B. B. J., Witajewska-Baltvilka, B., & Møller, R. E. D. (2023). Inclusive stakeholder engagement for equitable knowledge co-production: Insights from the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme in climate change research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 32(1), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.32.1.11

  • Lotrecchiano, G. R., Misra, S., Thompson Klein, J., Stokols, D., Báez, L. S., Ferrigno Came, F., Goñi Mazzitelli, M., Kurie, S., Lant, T., Laursen, B., Lebow, D., Mäkinen, E. I., Medina, N. G., Méndez, L. B., Potterbusch, M., Salazar, M., Trivedi, C., & Vienna Baptista Bianca. (2020). Communication in Transdisciplinary Teams. https://books.google.ch/books/about/Communication_in_Transdisciplinary_Teams.html?id=aS3EDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

  • Louviot, M., Moody, Z., & Darbellay, F. (2020). L’enfant et ses droits participatifs dans le contexte scolaire. Le cas de la Suisse romande. Modèles d’enfance Joués et Déjoués, 64, 28–37.

  • Marchart, O., & Martinsen, R. (2020). Foucault und das Politische. Transdisziplinäre Impulse für die Politische Theorie der Gegenwart. Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Literatur, 8(2), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.21827/zfphl.8.2.35775

  • Matschoss, K., Pietilä, M., Rask, M., & Suni, T. (2020). Co-creating transdisciplinary global change research agendas in Finland. European Journal of Futures Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-020-0162-3

  • McGregor, S. L. T. (2020). Transdisciplinarity and Transpraxis. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 11(0 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.22545/2020/00134

  • Meyer, E., & Peukert, D. (2020). Designing a Transformative Epistemology of the Problematic: A Perspective for Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research. Social Epistemology, 1–11.

  • Mitlin, D., Bennett, J., Horn, P., King, S., Makau, J., & Nyama, G. M. (2020). Knowledge Matters: The Potential Contribution of the Coproduction of Research. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00277-w

  • Mokiy, V. S. (2020). Information on the Space Systems. Transdisciplinary Aspect. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 16(29). https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2020.v16n29p26

  • Nagy, E., Ransiek, A., Schäfer, M., Lux, A., Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Marg, O., & Theiler, L. (2020). Transfer as a reciprocal process: How to foster receptivity to results of transdisciplinary research. Environmental Science & Policy, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.007

  • Newig, J., & Rose, M. (2020). Cumulating evidence in environmental governance, policy and planning research: Towards a research reform agenda. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1767551

  • Nobel, W. (2020). Ökologie. Eine Einführung mit Handlungsanleitung für eine nachhaltige Kommunalentwicklung. oekom. https://www.oekom.de/buch/oekologie-9783962382629

  • Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J. B., Leach, M., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2

  • OECD. (2020). Addressing societal challenges using transdisciplinary research. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/addressing-societal-challenges-using-transdisciplinary-research_0ca0ca45-en

  • Otero, I., Darbellay, F., Reynard, E., Hetényi, G., Perga, M.-E., Rüegg, J., Prasicek, G., Cracco, M., Fontcuberta, A., de Vaan, M., García, J., Bussard, J., Clivaz, C., Moos, C., Guisan, A., Schaefli, B., Mapelli, N., & de Bellefroid, B. (2020). Designing Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research on Mountains: What Place for the Unexpected? Mountain Research and Development, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-20-00036.1

  • Palmer, H., Polk, M., Simon, D., & Hansson, S. (2020). Evaluative and enabling infrastructures: Supporting the ability of urban co-production processes to contribute to societal change. Urban Transformations, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-020-00010-0

  • Patze-Diordiychuk, P. (Hrsg. ), Renner, P. (Hrsg. ), & Besser, R. (Hrsg. ). (2020). Methodenhandbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Lern- und Ergebnistransfer fördern (Vol. 5). https://www.oekom.de/buch/methodenhandbuch-buergerbeteiligung-9783960061731

  • Pearce, B. J., & Ejderyan, O. (2020). Joint problem framing as reflexive practice: Honing a transdisciplinary skill. Sustainability Science, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00744-2

  • Pequito Minga, J., Nobresantos, M. I., & Tiago de Oliveira, J. C. (2020). Paisagens angolanas com vultos Matemáticos, e outros Académicos.

  • Pleiger, H. (2020). The ‘Inter-Disciplined’ Exhibition—A Case Study. Museum and Society, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v18i4.3132

  • Pohl, C., Pearce, B., Mader, M., Senn, L., & Krütli, P. (2020). Integrating systems and design thinking in transdisciplinary case studies. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.4.11

  • Raineau, L. (2020). Regard socio-anthropologique sur la géologie de terrain en sciences de la Terre. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28(3–4). https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021010

  • Rajagopalan, R. (2020). Immersive Systemic Knowledge. Advancing Systems Thinking Beyond Rational Analysis. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030491345

  • Restrepo, M. J., Lelea, M. A., & Kaufmann, B. A. (2020). Assessing the quality of collaboration in transdisciplinary sustainability research: Farmers’ enthusiasm to work together for the reduction of post-harvest dairy losses in Kenya. Environmental Science & Policy, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.004

  • Rhodius, R. (Hrsg. ), Bachinger, M. (Hrsg. ), & Koch, B. (Hrsg. ). (2020). Wildnis, Wald, Mensch. Forschungsbeiträge zur Entwicklung einer Nationalparkregion am Beispiel des Schwarzwalds. oekom. https://www.oekom.de/buch/wildnis-wald-mensch-9783962380458

  • Ribeiro, B., Shapira, P., Benneworth, P., Bengtsson, L., Bührer, S., Castro-martínez, E., Meiken, H., Jarmai, K., Lindner, R., Olmos-Peñuela, J., & Ott, C. (2020). Considering the dilemma of societal alignment: A response. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 5(3), 316–331.

  • Robson-Williams, M., Small, B., & Robson-Williams, R. (2020). Designing transdisciplinary projects for collaborative policy-making: The Integration and Implementation Sciences framework as a tool for reflection. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.3.7

  • Rocha, P. L. B. da, Pardini, R., Viana, B. F., & El-Hani, C. N. (2020). Fostering inter- and transdisciplinarity in discipline-oriented universities to improve sustainability science and practice. Sustainability Science, 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00761-1

  • Rose, M., & Maibaum, K. (2020). Meeting the challenge of (co-)designing real-world laboratories: Insights from the Well-Being Transformation Wuppertal project. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.3.5

  • Rüegg, S. R., & Häsler, B. (2020). One Health continues to evolve for better health of people, animals and ecosystems.

  • Saidi, N. (n.d.). Evaluating the anticipated policy impact of research outputs: Introducing the SPEIDY framework Academic Report-March 2020.

  • Sarmiento, F. O. (ed), & Frolich, L. M. (ed). (2020). The Elgar Companion to Geography, Transdisciplinarity and Sustainability. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/the-elgar-companion-to-geography-transdisciplinarity-and-sustainability-9781786430090.html

  • Savoy, H. M., Peters, D. P. C., & Young, K. I. (2020). Complex Disease Problems Across Scales: Perspectives on Advancing Disease Ecology with Trans‐Disciplinary Research. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 101(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1649

  • Schäfer, M. (ed), Lux, A. (ed), & Bergmann, M. (ed). (2020a). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research—Linking research processes and outputs to societal effects. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/environmental-science-and-policy/special-issue/10VL0N9MMHM

  • Schäfer, M., Lux, A., & Bergmann, M. (2020b). Editorial to the special issue “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research—Linking research processes and outputs to societal effects”. Environmental Science & Policy, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.018

  • Schikowitz, A. (2020). Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects—Coping with inherent tensions. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(2), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653154

  • Schmidt, L., Falk, T., Siegmund-Schultze, M., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2020). The Objectives of Stakeholder Involvement in Transdisciplinary Research. A Conceptual Framework for a Reflective and Reflexive Practise. Ecological Economics, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106751

  • Scholz, R. W., Czichos, R., Parycek, P., & Lampoltshammer, T. J. (2020). Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: A first validation of an assessment method. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.020

  • Schön, S., Eismann, C., Wendt-Schwarzburg, H., & Kuhn, D. (2020). Transdisziplinäres Innovationsmanagement. Nachhaltigkeitsprojekte wirksam umsetzen. https://www.inter3.de/de/veroeffentlichungen/details/article/innovationsmanagement.html

  • Sellke, P., Bergmann, M., Dreyer, M., Marg, O., & Ober, S. (2020). The Kopernikus Project ENavi: Linking science, business, and civil society. In The Role of Public Participation in Energy Transitions. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819515-4.00007-6

  • Simon, D. (ed), Palmer, H. (ed), & Riise, J. (ed). (2020). Comparative Urban Research From Theory To Practice. https://policy.bristoluniversitypress.co.uk/comparative-urban-research-from-theory-to-practice

  • Skelton, M. (2020). How cognitive links and decision-making capacity shape sectoral experts’ recognition of climate knowledge for adaptation. Climatic Change, 162(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02859-3

  • Smetschka, B., & Gaube, V. (2020). Co-creating formalized models: Participatory modelling as method and process in transdisciplinary research and its impact potentials. Environmental Science & Policy, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.005

  • Steuri, B., Bender, S., & Cortekar, J. (2020). Successful user-science interaction to co-develop the new urban climate model PALM-4U. Urban Climate, 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100630

  • Steuri, B., Blome, T., Bülow, K., El Zohbi, J., Hoffmann, P., Petersen, J., Pfeifer, S., Rechid, D., & Jacob, D. (2020). Behind the scenes of an interdisciplinary effort: Conception, design and production of a flyer on climate change for the citizens of Hamburg. Advances in Science and Research, 17. https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-9-2020

  • Stieß, I., Birzle-Harder, B., & Stein, M. (2020). Soziale Teilhabe durch nachhaltigen Konsum: Ergebnisse eines Verbraucher*innen-Panels.

  • Szostak, R. (2020). Making Sense of World History. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003013518

  • Trechsel, L., Steinböck, C., Azeri Ogalleh, S., Zimmermann, A., Herweg, K., & Breu, T. (2020). Unlocking knowledge for sustainability: Partnership-based research and education. In CDE Policy Brief.

  • Tröger, K., Lelea, M. A., Hensel, O., & Kaufmann, B. (2020). Re-framing post-harvest losses through a situated analysis of the pineapple value chain in Uganda. Geoforum, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.017

  • Twelbeck, K. (2020). Wheat: A powerful crop in US-American culture: Between politics and plant agency. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.29.4.8

  • Verwoerd, L., Klaassen, P., van Veen, S. C., De Wildt-Liesveld, R., & Regeer, B. J. (2020). Combining the roles of evaluator and facilitator: Assessing societal impacts of transdisciplinary research while building capacities to improve its quality. Environmental Science and Policy, 103, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.011

  • Vilsmaier, U. (ed), Faschingeder, G. (ed), & Merçon, J. (ed). (2020a). Methods for Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research and Learning based on Paulo Freire (Vol. 37). https://www.mattersburgerkreis.at/site/de/publikationen/jep/alleausgabenartikel/article/502.html

  • Vilsmaier, U., Faschingeder, G., & Merçon, J. (2020b). Learning from Paulo Freire for Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research. JOURNAL FÜR ENTWICKLUNGSPOLITIK, 37(3).

  • Visser  Visser, Muriel, J. (2020). Seeking Understanding The Lifelong Pursuit to Build the Scientific Mind.

  • Wada, M., Grigorovich, A., Fang, M. L., Sixsmith, J., & Kontos, P. (2020). An Exploration of Experiences of Transdisciplinary Research in Aging and Technology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(1).

  • Wanner, M., Bernert, P., Fischer, nele, & Schmitt, M. (2020). TRANSFORMATIVE INNOVATION LAB: Handbook to facilitate students’ real-world laboratory projects to promote transformative and transdisciplinary competencies.

  • Wuelser, B., Chesney, M., Mayer, H., Niggli, U., Pohl, C., Sahakian, M., Stauffacher, M., Zinsstag, J., & Edwards, P. (2020). Priority themes for Swiss sustainability research. swiss academies of arts and sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337939

  • Zinsstag, J. (2020a). One Health: Auf dem Weg zu einer integrierteren Wissenschaft. Bulletin Der Schweizerischen Akademie Der Geistes- Und Sozialwissenschaften, 26(2), 27–31.

  • Zinsstag, J. (2020b). Une seule santé: Vers une science plus inclusive. Bulletin de l’Académie Suisse Des Sciences Humaines et Sociales, 26(2), 277–291.

  • 2050, T.-T. W. in. (2019). The Digital revolution and Sustainable development: Opportunities and Challenges.

  • Agramont, A., Craps, M., Balderrama, M., & Huysmans, M. (2019). Transdisciplinary Learning Communities to Involve Vulnerable Social Groups in Solving Complex Water-Related Problems in Bolivia. Water, 11(2), 385.

  • Bammer, G. (2019). What makes a researcher transdisciplinary? A framework to identify expertise. Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research. GAIA, 28.

  • Bauer, A., & Kastenhofer, K. (2019). Policy advice in technology assessment: Shifting roles, principles and boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 139, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.023

  • Collado-Ruano, J., Madroñero-Morillo, M., & Álvarez-González, F. (2019). Training Transdisciplinary Educators: Intercultural Learning and Regenerative Practices in Ecuador. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 38(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09652-5

  • Debono, M. W., & Souza, G. M. (2019). Plants as electromic plastic interfaces: A mesological approach. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 146, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2019.02.007

  • Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2019). Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen, Band 2: Eine Methodensammlung. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://books.google.ch/books?id=pdKiDwAAQBAJ

  • Defila, R., & Giulio, A. D. (2019). Wissenschaftspolitische Empfehlungen zum Forschungs-und Förderformat Reallabor. https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/d84F5EIiRHwmWl1

  • Di Giulio, A., & Defila, R. (2019). Transdisziplinäre Umweltforschung: Wenn Wissenschaft zuhören lernt und Laien zu Fachleuten werden. In Umweltpolitik in der Schweiz. Von der Forstpolizei zur Ökobilanzierung.

  • Fuentes Canosa, A., & Collado Ruano, J. (2019). Transdisciplinary epistemological foundations of education and neuroscience. Sophia, Colección de Filosofía de La Educación, 26, 83–113.

  • Groth  Christian (Hrsg.), S. und R. (2019). Zusammen arbeiten—Praktiken der Koordination und Kooperation in kollaborativen Prozessen. 400.

  • Guimarães, M. H., Pohl, C., Bina, O., & Varanda, M. (2019). Who is doing inter- and transdisciplinary research, and why? An empirical study of motivations, attitudes, skills, and behaviours. Futures, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102441

  • Hall, K. L., Vogel, A. L., & Croyle, R. T. (2019). Strategies for team science success: Handbook of evidence-based principles for cross-disciplinary science and practical lessons learned from health researchers (K. L. Hall, A. L. Vogel, & R. T. Croyle, Eds.). Springer Nature.

  • Hook, D. (2019). The Open Tide – How openness in research and communication is becoming the default setting. LSE Impact Blog.

  • Hubbard, P., & Colpaert, J. (2019). Toward Transdisciplinarity in Computer-Assisted Language Learning. CALICO Journal, 36(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.37499

  • Iwaniec, D. M., Cook, E. M., Barbosa, O., & Grimm, N. B. (2019). The Framing of Urban Sustainability Transformations. Sustainability, 11(3), 573. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030573

  • Jahn, T., Keil, F., & Marg, O. (2019). Transdisziplinarität: Zwischen Praxis und Theorie. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.1.6

  • knoedler, A. (2019). Sparking Ideas for Visualizing Innovative Research Teams. https://www.exaptive.com/blog/sparking-ideas-for-visualizing-innovative-research-teams

  • Krohn, W., Grunwald, A., & Ukowitz, M. (2019). Transdisziplinäre Forschung kontrovers ‐ Antworten und Ausblicke. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 28(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.1.7

  • Lawrence, R. (2019). Transdisciplinary responses to children’s health challenges in the context of rapid urbanization. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154097

  • Lawrence, R. J., Forbat, J., & Zufferey, J. (2019). Rethinking conceptual frameworks and models of health and natural environments. Health (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459318785717

  • Lux, A., Schäfer, M., Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Marg, O., Nagy, E., Ransiek, A.-C., & Theiler, L. (2019). Societal effects of transdisciplinary sustainability research—How can they be strengthened during the research process? Environmental Science & Policy, 101, 183–191.

  • Mader, C., Hilty, L. M., Som, C., & Wäger, P. (2019). Transparenz normativer Orientierungen in partizipativen TA-Projekten. TATuP Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 28(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.1.58

  • Mair, D., Smillie, L., La Placa, G., Schwendinger, F., Raykovska, M., Pasztor, Z., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Understanding our political nature: How to put knowledge and reason at the heart of political decision-making. European Commission, Joint Research Centre EUR, 29783.

  • Mauch, C. (2019). Slow Hope. RCC Perspectives, 1, 1–43.

  • Mokiy, V. (2019a). Systems transdisciplinary approach in the general classification of scientific approaches. Available at SSRN 3435458.

  • Mokiy, V. (2019b). The External and Internal Planet’s Limits to Growth: Transdisciplinary Rethinking. Available at SSRN 3491590.

  • Mokiy, V. (2019c). Training Generalists in Higher Education: Its Theoretical Basis and Prospects. Available at SSRN 3456092.

  • Mokiy, V. (2019d). Using the systemic-transdisciplinary approach to enhance the operational reliability and maintenance programming of complex technical objects. Available at SSRN 3440111.

  • Mokiy, V. (2019e). World Social and Economic Development in the Theory of Ternary Counterpoints. European Scientific Journal, August.

  • Musch  Anne, A.-K. von S. (2019). (Un)intended effects of participation in sustainability science: A criteria-guided comparative case study. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 55–66.

  • Pasquier, F., & Nicolescu, B. (2019). To be or Not to be Transdisciplinary, That is the New Question. So, How to be Transdisciplinary? Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.22545/2019/0110

  • ReigosayPrezMartn2019. (n.d.).

  • Richardson-Ngwenya, P., Restrepo, M. J., Fernández, R., & Kaufmann, B. A. (2019). Participatory video proposals: A tool for empowering farmer groups in rural innovation processes? Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.022

  • Schneider, F., Buser, T., Keller, R., Tribaldos, T., & Rist, S. (2019). Research funding programmes aiming for societal transformations: Ten key stages. Science and Public Policy, 46(3), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy074

  • Schneider, F., Giger, M., Harari, N., Moser, S., Oberlack, C., Providoli, I., Schmid, L., Tribaldos, T., & Zimmermann, A. (2019). Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: Three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environmental Science & Policy, 102, 26–35.

  • Schulz, G., Arvidson, P. S., & Augsburg, T. (2019). Volume 37 Number 2 (2019) – Association for Interdisciplinary Studies. https://interdisciplinarystudies.org/volume-37-number-2-2019/

  • Special Issue: Sustainable Economy—Perspectives of Change. (2019). GAIA, 3.

  • Vienni Baptista, B., Maryl, M., Wciślik, P., Fletcher, I., Buchner, A., Wallace, D., & Pohl, C. (2019). Preliminary Report of Literature Review on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3760417

  • Vienni Baptista, B., & Rojas-Castro, S. (2019). Transdisciplinary institutionalization in higher education: A two-level analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 1–18.

  • Zinsstag, J., Pelikan, K., Hammel, T., Tischler, J., Flahault, A., Utzinger, J., & Probst-Hensch, N. (2019). Reverse innovation in global health. Journal of Public Health and Emergency, 3. http://jphe.amegroups.com/article/view/4979

  • Andres, C., Hoerler, R., Home, R., Joerin, J., Dzahini-Obiatey, H. K., Ameyaw, G. A., Domfeh, O., Blaser, W. J., Gattinger, A., Offei, S. K., & Six, J. (2018). Social network to inform and prevent the spread of cocoa swollen shoot virus disease in Ghana. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 38(5), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0538-y

  • Belcher, B. M., Ramirez, L. F., Davel, R., & Claus, R. (2019). A response to Hansson and Polk (2018) “Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact”. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy037

  • Black, D., Scally, G., Orme, J., Hunt, A., Pilkington, P., Lawrence, R., & Ebi, K. (2018). Moving Health Upstream in Urban Development: Reflections on the Operationalization of a Transdisciplinary Case Study. Global Challenges. https://doi.org/doi:10.1002/gch2.201700103

  • Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2018). What Kind of Great Transformation? The Imperial Mode of Living as a Major Obstacle to Sustainability Politics. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 287–292.

  • Brunnengräber, A., & Haas, T. (2018). Vom Regen in die Traufe: Die sozial-ökologischen Schattenseiten der E-Mobilität. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 273–276.

  • Bruns, A., & Gerend, J. (2018). In Search of a Decolonial Urban Transformation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 293–297.

  • Bührmann, A. D., & Franke, Y. (2018). Transdisziplinarität: Versuch einer Kartografierung des Feldes. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.2.3047

  • Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2018). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222

  • Cabrera, D., & Cabrera, L. (2018). Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research: Framework #4. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.3

  • Carr, G., Loucks, D. P., & Blöschl, G. (2018). Gaining insight into interdisciplinary research and education programmes: A framework for evaluation. Research Policy, 47(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.010

  • Christian, P. (2018). Ich fürchte, ich bin ein transdisziplinärer Methodologe. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 281–283.

  • Cullati, S., Kliegel, M., & Widmer, E. (2018). Development of reserves over the life course and onset of vulnerability in later life. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(8), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0395-3

  • Decker, T. (2018). Achtung Plastik! Wie Verbraucher(innen) beim Einkaufen Plastikmüll reduzieren können. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 330–331.

  • Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2018). Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen: Eine Methodensammlung. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21530-9

  • Della-Piana, G. M., Gardner, M. K., & Mayne, Z. M. (2018). Toward a Dialogue: Following Professional Standards on Education Achievement Testing. Journal of Research Practice, 14(2). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/602/491

  • Drexler, C., Braun, V., Christie, D., Claramunt, B., Dax, T., Jelen, I., Kanka, R., Katsoulakos, N., Le Roux, G., Price, M., Scheurer, T., & R., W. (2016). Mountains for Europe‘s Future – A strategic research agenda An input to the Horizon 2020 Work Programmes and Calls 2018–2020 April 2016.

  • Durose, C., Richardson, L., & Perry, B. (2018). Craft metrics to value co-production. Nature, 562, 32–33.

  • Ekardt, F. (2018). Nachhaltigkeitsforschung und Erkenntnistheorie: Auslassungen der Transformationsdebatte. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 277–280.

  • Evans, N. M., & Stewart, W. P. (2018). The Role of Naturalness in Ecological Restoration: A Case Study from the Cook County Forest Preserves. Nature and Culture, 13(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2018.130203

  • Fam, D., Neuhauser, L., & Gibbs, P. (2018). Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education. The Art of Collaborative Research and Collective Learning. Springer International Publishing. https://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319937427

  • Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., & Greiff, S. (2018). Collaborative problem-solving education for the twenty-first-century workforce. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 367–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y

  • Fischer, D., Schäfer, T., & Borner, J. (2018). Narrations of Sustainability: How to Tell the Story of the Socio-Ecological Transformation. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 334–336.

  • Fredericks, J., Hespanhol, L., Parker, C., Zhou, D., & Tomitsch, M. (2018). Blending pop-up urbanism and participatory technologies: Challenges and opportunities for inclusive city making. City, Culture and Society, 12, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.06.005

  • Fritz, L., & Binder, C. R. (2018). Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research. Sustainability, 10(8). http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2853

  • Gaiaskop. (2018). GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 270–271.

  • Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(2), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244

  • Grunwald, A. (2018). Transformative Wissenschaft als honest broker? Das passt! GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 113–116. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.4

  • Hansson, S., & Polk, M. (2018). Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact. Research Evaluation, 27(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvy004

  • Heinrichs, H. (2018). Sustainability Science—An introduction. In GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society (Vol. 27, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.8

  • Hering, J. G. (2018a). Getting Water Research into Policy and Practice (GRIPP for Water). National Water Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1469682

  • Hering, J. G. (2018b). Implementation Science for the Environment. Environmental Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00874

  • Hering, J. G. (2018c). Reconnecting academic research with societal needs through assessment. OSF Home. https://osf.io/kbcn2

  • Herrero, P., Dedeurwaerdere, T., & Osinski, A. (2018). Design features for social learning in transformative transdisciplinary research. Sustainability Science, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0641-7

  • Herrero-Jáuregui, C., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Reyes, M. F., Telesnicki, M., Agramonte, I., Easdale, M. H., Schmitz, M. F., Aguiar, M., Gómez-Sal, A., & Montes, C. (2018). What do We Talk about When We Talk about Social-Ecological Systems? A Literature Review. Sustainability, 10(8). http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/8/2950

  • Hilger, A., Rose, M., & Wanner, M. (2018). Changing Faces – Factors Influencing the Roles of Researchers in Real-World Laboratories. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.9

  • Jaeger-Erben, M., Kramm, J., Sonnberger, M., Völker, C., Albert, C., Graf, A., Hermans, K., Lange, S., Santarius, T., Schröter, B., Sievers-Glotzbach, S., & Winzer, J. (2018). Building Capacities for Transdisciplinary Research: Challenges and Recommendations for Early-Career Researchers. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(4), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.4.10

  • Kassab, O., Schwarzenbach, R. P., & Gotsch, N. (2018). Assessing Ten Years of Inter- and Transdisciplinary Research, Education, and Outreach: The Competence Center Environment and Sustainability (CCES) of the ETH Domain. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.10

  • Kirchhoff, T. (2018). ‘Kulturelle Ökosystemdienstleistungen’. Eine begriffliche und methodische Kritik [’Cultural Ecosystem Services’. A Conceptual and Methodological Critique]. Verlag Karl Alber.

  • Klein, J. T. (2018). Current Drivers of Interdisciplinarity: The What and the Why. In A.-S. Mohammed Nasser, A.-K. Abdullah Khamis, A. Salim Said, & S. Naifa Eid (Eds.), Promoting Interdisciplinarity in Knowledge Generation and Problem Solving (pp. 14–28). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3878-3.ch002

  • Knodt, M., Kemmerzell, J., Fraune, C., & Müller, R. (2018). Die Energiewende im Mehrebenensystem: Politische Koordination und Partizipation im Fokus. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 323.

  • Koseki, S. A. (2018). The geographic evolution of political cleavages in Switzerland: A network approach to assessing levels and dynamics of polarization between local populations. PLoS ONE, 13(11). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208227#references

  • Kueffer, C., Forêt, P., Hall, M., & Wiedmer, C. (2018). Applying the Environmental Humanities. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 254–256. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.16

  • Lagaay, A., & Seitz, A. (2018). Wissen Formen – Performative Akte zwischen Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kunst. Erkundungen mit dem Theater der Versammlung. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839439647

  • Lang, R. W., & Prammer, H. K. (2018). Sustainable Development ‐ Responsible Technologies and Management: Ein neuer Schwerpunkt an der Universität Linz. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 327–329.

  • Lehrer, N. (2018). Beauty in the flow? Unravelling the messy design process of an urban stream. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 13(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2018.1553397

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2018). Interdisciplinarity as Diversity in Citation Patterns among Journals: Rao-Stirling Diversity, Relative Variety, and the Gini coefficient. Cornell University Library. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04115v2

  • Lopes Pinheiro, S., Calloni, H., & Pasquier, F. (2018). O Encontro como potência para a realização da ética transdisciplinar. REMEA - Revista Eletrônica Do Mestrado Em Educação Ambiental, 1. https://doi.org/10.14295/remea.v0i1.8561

  • Lüneburg, B. (2018). TransCoding – From `Highbrow Art’ to Participatory Culture. Social Media – Art – Research. transcript Verlag. https://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4108-0/transcoding-from-highbrow-art-to-participatory-culture/

  • Lüthje, C., & Thiele, F. (2018). The Communicative Construction of Interdisciplinarity: Group Discussions with Climate Scientists. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 306–311.

  • Maag, S., Alexander, T. J., Kase, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2018). Indicators for measuring the contributions of individual knowledge brokers. Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.002

  • Mahshid, S., & Niklas, G. (2018). Participatory foresight for technology assessment – Towards an evaluation approach for knowledge co-creation. TATuP Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis, 27(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.27.2.53

  • Mann, C., & Schäfer, M. (2018). Developing sustainable water and land management options: Reflections on a transdisciplinary research process. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0451-3

  • McPhee, C., Bliemel, M. J., & van der Bijl-Brouwer, M. (2018). Transdisciplinary Innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review.

  • Medina, N. G., Báez, L., & Mendez, L. B. (2018). Collaborative Transdisciplinary Research In A Small Institution: Challenges And Opportunities. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 21. https://doi.org/10.28945/4028

  • Miller, C. A., & Wyborn, C. (2018). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016

  • Misra, S., & Lotrecchiano, G. R. (2018). Special issue of 10 articles on transdisciplinary communication. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 21, 41–253.

  • Mitchell, C., Fam, D., & Cordell, D. (2018). Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research: Framework #3. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.1.3

  • Montuori, A. (2018). Creating Social Creativity: Integrative Transdisciplinarity and the Epistemology of Complexity. In I. Lebuda & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research (pp. 743–765). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_25

  • Moody, Z., & Darbellay, F. (2018). Studying childhood, children, and their rights: The challenge of interdisciplinarity. Childhood. A Journal of Global Child Research, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218798016

  • Moschitz, H., Landert, J., Schader, C., & Frick, R. (2018). From Urban Agriculture to Urban Food: A Food System Analysis Based on Interaction between Research, Policy, and Society. Nature and Culture, 13(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2018.130106

  • Muhar, A., & Penker, M. (2018). Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research: Framework #5. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 272.

  • National Research Council. (2018). Collaborations of Consequence: NAKFI’s 15 Years Igniting Innovation at the Intersections of Disciplines. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25239

  • Nuno Martins, P. (2018). Being Transdisciplinary in Human Sciences: The usefulness of Integrative Medicine in contemporary society. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 9(April). https://doi.org/10.22545/2018/00100

  • Pereira, L. M., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., & Olsson, P. (2018). Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432

  • Perry, B. G., Patel, Z., Noren Bretzer, Y., & Polk, M. (2018). Organising for Co-production: Local Interaction Platforms for Urban Sustainability. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 189–198.

  • Pettibone, L., Blättel-Mink, B., Balázs, B., Giulio, A. D., Göbel, C., Heubach, K., Hummel, D., Lundershausen, J., Lux, A., Potthast, T., Vohland, K., & Wyborn, C. (2018). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research and Citizen Science: Options for Mutual Learning. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 222–225. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.9

  • Phelan, H., & Nunan, M. (2018). To Write or Not to Write? The Contested Nature and Role of Writing in Arts Practice Research. Journal of Research Practice, 14(2). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/592/492

  • Pinter-Wollman, N., Fiore, S. M., Theraulaz, G., & Penn, A. (2018). Theme issue ‘Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 373(1753). http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/373/1753

  • Pohl, C. (2018). Ich fürchte, ich bin ein transdisziplinärer Methodologe. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 281–283. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.3.6

  • Pregernig, M., Rhodius, R., & Winkel, G. (2018). Design Junctions in Real-World Laboratories: Analyzing Experiences Gained from the Project Knowledge Dialogue Northern Black Forest. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.9

  • Puerari, E., de Koning, J., von Wirth, T., Karré, P., Mulder, I., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs. Sustainability, 10(6), 1893.

  • Radtke, J. (2018). Energiedemokratie durch Bürgerenergie? Die Grenzen finanzieller Bürgerbeteiligung. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 284–286.

  • Renn, O., Scholz, R. W., & e.V., I. for A. S. S. P. (IASS). (2018). Ein Neues Transdisziplinäres Projekt zu den Unbeabsichtigen Nebenwirkungen der Digitalisierung – DiDaT: Die Nutzung Digitaler Daten als Gegenstand eines Transdisziplinären Prozesses.

  • Restrepo, M. J., Lelea, M. A., & Kaufmann, B. A. (2018). Evaluating knowledge integration and co-production in a 2-year collaborative learning process with smallholder dairy farmer groups. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0553-6

  • Ribeiro, B., Bengtsson, L., Benneworth, P., Bührer, S., Castro-Martínez, E., Hansen, M., Jarmai, K., Lindner, R., Olmos-Peñuela, J., Ott, C., & Shapira, P. (2018). Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033

  • Richardson-Ngwenya, P., Höhne, M., & Kaufmann, B. (2018). Participatory problem analysis of crop activities in rural Tanzania with attention to gender and wealth: ‘Setting the scene’ to enhance relevance and avoid exclusion in pro-poor innovation projects. Food Security, 10(4), 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0791-6

  • Rieß, W., Mischo, C., & Waltner, E.-M. (2018). Ziele einer Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung in Schule und Hochschule: Auf dem Weg zu empirisch überprüfbaren Kompetenzen. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 298–305.

  • Rohrbach, B., Laube, P., & Weibel, R. (2018). Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use. Landscape and Urban Planning, 176, 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.002

  • Rosa, A., Gudowsky, N., & Warnke, P. (2018). But do they deliver? Participatory agenda setting on the test bed. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0143-y

  • Rowland, S. (2018). Jungian Literary Criticism: The Essential Guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561752

  • Ruano, J. C., Morillo, M. M., & González, F. J. Á. (2018). Transdisciplinary education: Training in skills for the good living. Ensaio, 26(100), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362018002601487

  • Rüegg, S. R., Häsler, B., & Zinsstag, J. (2018). Integrated approaches to health. A handbook for the evaluation of One Health. Wageningen Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-875-9

  • Rüegg, S. R., Nielsen, L. R., Buttigieg, S. C., Santa, M., Aragrande, M., Canali, M., Ehlinger, T., Chantziaras, I., Boriani, E., Radeski, M., Bruce, M., Queenan, K., & Häsler, B. (2018). A Systems Approach to Evaluate One Health Initiatives. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5(23). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00023

  • Sahakian, M., & Seyfang, G. (2018). A sustainable consumption teaching review: From building competencies to transformative learning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.238

  • Saric, J., Utzinger, J., & Bonfoh, B. (2018). Research productivity and main publishing institutions in Côte d’Ivoire, 2000–2016. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0406-1

  • Schäpke, N., Stelzer, F., Caniglia, G., Bergmann, M., Wanner, M., Singer-Brodowski, M., Loorbach, D., Olsson, P., Baedeker, C., & Lang, D. J. (2018). Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16

  • Scherhaufer, P., Höltinger, S., Salak, B., Schauppenlehner, T., & Schmidt, J. (2018). A participatory integrated assessment of the social acceptance of wind energy. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.022

  • Schmidt, L., Hartberger, K., Kobbe, S., Falk, T., Wesselow, M., & Schumann, C. (2018). Stakeholder Involvement in Transdisciplinary Research: Lessons from Three Projects on Sustainable Land Management in a North-South Setting. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.3.12

  • Schneider, F., & Buser, T. (2018). Promising degrees of stakeholder interaction in research for sustainable development. Sustainability Science, 13(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0507-4

  • Schneider, P., Salvo, G. D., & Paulin, N. (2018). Nachhaltigkeit an Schweizer Hochschulen: Das Erfolgsbeispiel Nachhaltigkeitswoche Zürich. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 324–326.

  • Scholz, R. W. (2018). Ways and modes of utilizing Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism: New perspectives for decision and sustainability research? Environment Systems and Decisions, 38(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9678-5

  • Schuck-Zöller, S., Brinkmann, C., & Rödder, S. (2018). Integrating Research and Practice in Emerging Climate Services—Lessons from Other Transdisciplinary Dialogues. In S. Serrao-Neumann, A. Coudrain, & L. Coulter (Eds.), Communicating Climate Change Information for Decision-Making (pp. 105–118). Springer. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319746685

  • Sellberg, M. (2018). Creating meaningful transdisciplinary collaborations during the limited time of a PhD. Social-Ecological Systems Scholars, 11 April 2018. https://sesscholars.wordpress.com/2018/04/11/creating-meaningful-transdisciplinary-collaborations-during-the-limited-time-of-a-phd/

  • Senabre Hidalgo, E. (2018). Management of a Multidisciplinary Research Project: A Case Study on Adopting Agile Methods. Journal of Research Practice, 14(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/588

  • Stover, B., Lubega, F., Namubiru, A., Bakengesa, E., Luboga, S. A., Makumbi, F., Kiwanuka, N., Ndizihiwe, A., Mukooyo, E., Hurley, E., Lim, T., Borse, N. N., Bernhardt, J., Wood, A., Sheppard, L., Barnhart, S., & Hagopian, A. (2018). Conducting a Large Public Health Data Collection Project in Uganda: Methods, Tools, and Lessons Learned. Journal of Research Practice, 14(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/549/488

  • Suryanarayanan, S., Kleinman, D. L., Gratton, C., Toth, A., Guedot, C., Groves, R., Piechowski, J., Moore, B., Hagedorn, D., Kauth, D., Swan, H., & Celley, M. (2018). Collaboration Matters: Honey Bee Health as a Transdisciplinary Model for Understanding Real-World Complexity. BioScience. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy118

  • Süßbauer, E., Maas-Deipenbrock, R. M., Friedrich, S., Kreß-Ludwig, M., Langen, N., & Muster, V. (2018). Employee roles in sustainability transformation processes. GAIA, 28, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.28.S1.7

  • Szostak, R. (2018). Interdisciplinarity and Adapted Physical Activity. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 35(3), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.2017-0079

  • Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., & Rosas-Casals, M. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085

  • Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: The methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality and Quantity, 52(3), 1209–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0513-8

  • Tobias, S., Ströbele, M. F., & Buser, T. (2018). How transdisciplinary projects influence participants’ ways of thinking: A case study on future landscape development. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0532-y

  • Trechsel, L. J., Zimmerman, A. B., Graf, D., Herweg, K., Lundsgaard Hansen, L., Rufer, L., Tribelhorn, T., & Wastl-Walter, D. (2018). Mainstreaming Education for Sustainable Development at a Swiss University: Navigating the Traps of Institutionalization. Higher Education Policy, 31(4), 471–490.

  • Tretter, F., Simon, K.-H., Böse, O., Reilly, S., Goepel, E., & Soentgen, J. (2018). Umwelt und Gesundheit im Kontext der Sustainable Development Goals. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 332–333.

  • Tröger, K., Lelea, M. A., Hensel, O., & Kaufmann, B. (2018). Embracing the Complexity: Surfacing Problem Situations with Multiple Actors of the Pineapple Value Chain in Uganda. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 31(5), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9443-1

  • Ukowitz, M., & Pichler-Koban, C. (2018). Der Vertigo-Effekt. Institutionelle Dynamiken im Naturschutz. Metropolis Verlag. https://www.metropolis-verlag.de/Der-Vertigo-Effekt/1363/book.do

  • Ulrich, W. (2018). Toward a knowledge democracy. Farewell to Ulrich’s Bimonthly. Ulrich’s Bimonthly, March-May. http://wulrich.com/bimonthly_march2018.html

  • van Breda, J., & Swilling, M. (2018). The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: Learning experiences and reflections from a transdisciplinary urban case study in Enkanini informal settlement, South Africa. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x

  • van den Akker, C. (2018). What are patterns in the humanities? Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2017.1296265

  • van der Hel, S. (2018). Science for change: A survey on the normative and political dimensions of global sustainability research. Global Environmental Change, 52, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.07.005

  • Vienni Baptista, B., Vasen, F., & Villa Soto, J. C. (2018). Interdisciplinary Centers in Latin American Universities: The Challenges of Institutionalization. Higher Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0092-x

  • von Wehrden, H., Guimarães, M. H., Bina, O., Varanda, M., Lang, D. J., John, B., Gralla, F., Alexander, D., Raines, D., White, A., & Lawrence, R. J. (2018). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: Finding the common ground of multi-faceted concepts. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0594-x

  • von Wirth, T., Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2018). Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895

  • Wagner, C. S. (2018). The Collaborative Era in Science. Governing the Network. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94986-4

  • Wang, J., Aenis, T., & Hofmann-Souki, S. (2018). Triangulation in participation: Dynamic approaches for science-practice interaction in land-use decision making in rural China. Land Use Policy, 72, 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.066

  • Willemsen, M., & Watson, R. (2018). A Transdisciplinary Approach to Wildlife Crime. In W. D. Moreto (Ed.), Wildlife Crime: From Theory to Practice (pp. 256–278). Temple University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326170772_A_Transdisciplinary_Approach_to_Wildlife_Crime

  • Wöbse, A.-K. (2018). 12 Fragen an &#8230. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 268–269.

  • Woltersdorf, L., Lang, P., & Döll, P. (2018). How to set up a transdisciplinary research project in Central Asia: Description and evaluation. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0625-7

  • Zimpelmann, B. (2018). Reallabore: Nuklei einer Wissenschaft für Nachhaltigkeit? Reflexionen der Gutachtergruppe zur ersten BaWü-Lab-Förderlinie. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(3), 321–322.

  • Zscheischler, J., Rogga, S., & Lange, A. (2018). The success of transdisciplinary research for sustainable land use: Individual perceptions and assessments. Sustainability Science, 13(4), 1061–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0556-3

  • Adler, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Breu, T., Wiesmann, U., & Pohl, C. (2017). Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0444-2

  • Akira Schickhaus, T. (2017). Interkulturelle Literaturwissenschaft und Wissenssoziologie. Studien zu deutsch- und japanischsprachigen Texten von Yoko Tawada. transcript Verlag. http://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4086-1/Interkulturelle-Literaturwissenschaft-und-Wissenssoziologie

  • Albrecht, C., & Bogner, A. (2017). Tischgespräche: Einladung zu einer interkulturellen Wissenschaft. transcript Verlag.

  • Antonietta Di, G., & Rico, D. (2017). Enabling university educators to equip students with inter- and transdisciplinary competencies. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(5), 630–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-02-2016-0030

  • Bammer, G. (2017a). Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity—Toolkit #7. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 7.

  • Bammer, G. (2017b). Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity—Toolkit #8. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.2.3

  • Bergmann, M., Gottschlich, D., Mölders, T., & Schramm, E. (2017). PoNa als inter- und transdisziplinäres Experiment in der Sozial-ökologischen Forschung. In D. Gottschlich & T. Mölders (Eds.), Politiken der Naturgestaltung. Ländliche Entwicklung und Agro-Gentechnik zwischen Kritik und Vision (pp. 243–263). Springer Fachmedien. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658081928#

  • Bergmann, M., & Jahn, T. (2017). Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research: Framework #2. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(4), 304. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.3

  • Beute Hochschule für Technik Berlin (Hrsg.). (2017). Research Day 2016: Stadt der Zukunft. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. https://www.bwv-verlag.de/shop/bwv/apply/viewdetail/id/5678/

  • Bieling, C. (2017). Transdisziplinär forschen: Varianten des Gelingens. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 52–53. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.11

  • Blättel-Mink, B. (2017). Rezension zu ‘R. Defila und A. Di Giulio (eds) (2016): Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. Köln Z Soziol, 69(3), 537–540.

  • Bradbury, H., Allen, W., Apgar, J. M., Babüroğlu, O. N., Bishop, K., Etmanski, C., Leahy, M. J., Lifvergren, S., Nicolaides, A., Pór, G., Smith, S., Teehankee, B., Uldall, B., Waddell, S., & Zandee, D. (2017). Cooking with Action Research: Stories and Resources for Self and Community Transformation. AR+ Action Research.

  • Broniatowski, D. A., & Magee, C. L. (2017). The Emergence and Collapse of Knowledge Boundaries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(3), 337–350.

  • Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (ed). (2017). Academic Recognition of Team Science: How to Optimise the Canadian Academic System.

  • Cörvers, R., de Kraker, J., Kemp, R., Martens, P., & van Lente, H. (2017). Sustainable Development Research at ICIS – Taking stock and looking ahead. Maastricht University. https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/sustainable-development-research-icis-–-taking-stock-and-looking-ahead

  • Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., & Lubart, T. (2017). Creativity, Design Thinking and Interdisciplinarity. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7524-7

  • Dieleman, H. (2017). Transdisciplinary Hermeneutics: A Symbiosis of Science, Art, Philosophy, Reflective Practice, and Subjective Experience. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 170–199.

  • Dieleman, H., Nicolescu, B., & Ertas, A. (2017). Transdisciplinary and Interdiscipinary Education and Research. The Academy of Transdisciplinary Learning & Advanced Studies (ATLAS). http://www.atlas-journal.org/index.php/term-2/2017-issue

  • Dixon, A. R., & Telles, E. E. (2017). Skin color and colorism: Global research, concepts, and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053315

  • Dombois, F. (2017). The Wind Tunnel Model – Transdisciplinary Encounters. Scheidegger & Spiess. https://www.scheidegger-spiess.ch/index.php?lang=de&page=books&view=co&booktype=order_1_releasedate&subject=1&artist=all&author=all&pd=ss&book=818

  • Emmenegger, R., Rowan, R., Zuppinger-Dingley, D., Krug, C., Parreño, M. A., & Korf, B. (2017). Ontology and integrative research on Global Environmental Change: Towards a critical GEC science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 29, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.001

  • Ferran, B., & Fisher, E. (2017). The experimental generation. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(1–2). https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/yisr20/42/1-2?nav=tocList

  • Fialho Teixeira, F., & Fialho Leandro Alves Teixeira, M. (2017). Spatiocracy 1: A transvergent approach to design. Perception of Space in Architecture and Culture: Adhocratic Spaces. https://www.spurbuch.de/en/product-reader-architecture/product/perception-of-space-in-architecture-and-culture-adhocratic-spaces.html

  • Frodeman, R., Klein, J. T., & Pacheco, R. C. D. S. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-oxford-handbook-of-interdisciplinarity-9780198733522?q=Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity&lang=en&cc=ch#

  • Fung, D. (2017). A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press

  • Guimarães, H., Fonseca, C., Gonzalez, C., & Pinto-Correia, T. (2017). Reflecting on Collaborative Research Into the Sustainability of Mediterranean Agriculture: A Case Study Using a Systematization of Experiences Approach. Journal of Research Practice, 13(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/557/470

  • Henke, J., Pasternack, P., & Schmid, S. (2017). Mission, Die dritte. Die Vielfalt jenseits hochschulischer Forschung und Lehre: Konzept und Kommunikation der Third Mission. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. https://www.bwv-verlag.de/shop/bwv/apply/viewdetail/id/5762/

  • Hering, J. G., & von Waldow, H. (2017). Concept note: Call for management of knowledge relating to freshwater and sustainable water management as a public good (version 2). In Eawag. Eawag. https://osf.io/28rhn/

  • Hoffmann, S., Pohl, C., & Hering, J. G. (2017a). Exploring transdisciplinary integration within a large research program: Empirical lessons from four thematic synthesis processes. Research Policy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.004

  • Hoffmann, S., Pohl, C., & Hering, J. G. (2017b). Methods and procedures of transdisciplinary knowledge integration: Empirical insights from four thematic synthesis processes. Ecology and Society, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08955-220127

  • Ingrisch, D., Mangelsdorf, M., & Dressel, G. (2017). Wissenskulturen im Dialog. Experimentalräume zwischen Wissenschaft und Kunst. transcript Verlag. http://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-3698-7/Wissenskulturen-im-Dialog

  • Kagan, S. (2017). Artful Sustainability: Queer-Convivialist Life-Art and the Artistic Turn in Sustainability Research. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 8, 151–168. https://doi.org/10.22545/2017/00092

  • Keestra, M. (2017). Metacognition and Reflection by Interdisciplinary Experts: Insights from Cognitive Science and Philosophy. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 121–169.

  • Kirchhoff, T., Karafyllis, N. C., Evers, D., Falkenburg, B., Gerhard, M., Hartung, G., Hübner, J., Köchy, K., Krohs, U., Potthast, T., Schäfer, O., Schiemann, G., Schlette, M., Schulz, R., & Vogelsang, F. (2017). Naturphilosophie. Ein Lehr- und Studienbuch. UTB/Mohr Siebeck. http://www.utb-shop.de/naturphilosophie-9427.html

  • Klein, J. T., & Falk-Krzesinski, H. J. (2017). Interdisciplinary and collaborative work: Framing promotion and tenure practices and policies. Research Policy, 46(6), 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.001

  • König, A., & Ravetz, J. (2017). Sustainability Science. Key Issues (p. 396). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Sustainability-Science-Key-Issues/Konig-Ravetz/p/book/9781138659285

  • Kottusch, C., & Schaffartzik, A. (2017). Sustainable Palm Oil? Insights from Material Flow and Land Use Analysis in Brazil’s Production Hotspot. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.2.17

  • Krohn, W., Grunwald, A., & Ukowitz, M. (2017). Transdisziplinäre Forschung revisited: Erkenntnisinteresse, Forschungsgegenstände, Wissensform und Methodologie. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(4), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.11

  • Kueffer, C., Lässer, K. T., Hall, M., & Swiss Academic Society for Environmental Research and Ecology, S. A. of H. and S. S. (2017). Applying the Environmental Humanities: Ten steps for action and implementation. https://naturalsciences.ch/service/publications/97610-applying-the-environmental-humanities-ten-steps-for-action-and-implementation

  • Lash-Marshall, W. G., Nomura, C., Eck, K., & Hirsch, P. (2017). Facilitating Collaboration across Disciplinary and Sectoral Boundaries: Applications of a Four-Step Strategic Intervention. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 200–220.

  • Lawrence, R. J., & Gatzweiler, F. W. (2017). Wanted: A Transdisciplinary Knowledge Domain for Urban Health. Journal of Urban Health, 94(4), 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0182-x

  • Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2017). Betweenness and Diversity in Journal Citation Networks as Measures of Interdisciplinarity. A Tribute to Eugene Garfield. ArXiv E-Prints, 1705.03272.

  • Lloyd, G. E. R. (2017). Where Now for the Interdisciplinary and Cross-Cultural Study of the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind? KNOW: A Journal on the Formation of Knowledge, 1(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/692007

  • Mehring, M., Bernard, B., Hummel, D., Liehr, S., & Lux, A. (2017). Halting biodiversity loss: How social–ecological biodiversity research makes a difference. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 13(1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1289246

  • Ott, C. (2017). Enabling Transformative Research: Lessons from the Eastern and Southern Africa Partnership Programme (1999-2015). Challenges in Sustainability, 5(1), 15–23.

  • Padmanabhan, M. (2017). Transdisciplinary Research and Sustainability: Collaboration, Innovation and Transformation. Routledge. https://books.google.ch/books?id=i6Q5DwAAQBAJ

  • Patze-Diordiychuk, P., Smettan, J., Renner, P., & Föhr, T. (2017a). Methodenhandbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Band 1: Beteiligungsprozesse erfolgreich planen (Vol. 1). oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/methodenhandbuch-buergerbeteiligung.html

  • Patze-Diordiychuk, P., Smettan, J., Renner, P., & Föhr, T. (2017b). Methodenhandbuch Bürgerbeteiligung. Band 2: Passende Beteiligungsformate wählen. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/methodenhandbuch-buergerbeteiligung-1.html

  • Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2017). Frameworks for Transdisciplinary Research: Framework #1. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(3), 232. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.3.3

  • Pohl, C., Krütli, P., & Stauffacher, M. (2017). Ten Reflective Steps for Rendering Research Societally Relevant. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.10

  • Rodrigues, L. M., McPherson, C., Young, W., Hemond, J., & Waterhouse, D. (2017). Current Reflections on Collaborative and Engaged Research. Journal of Research Practice, 13(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/518/473

  • Rogga, S., Kempa, D., Heitepriem, N., & Etterer, F. (2017). Jenseits von ‘Bürgerwissenschaften’—Neue Wege der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung im integrierten Naturschutz und dem Kulturlandschaftsmanagement. Lanschaftsplanung Und -Pflege, 39(1), 60–68.

  • Sanders, S., & Oberst, J. (2017). Changing perspectives on daylight: Science, technology, and culture. Science/AAAS. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.358.6363.680-b

  • Schäpke, N., Stelzer, F., Bergmann, M., Singer-Brodowski, M., Wanner, M., Caniglia, G., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Reallabore im Kontext transformativer Forschung: Ansatzpunkte zur Konzeption und Einbettung in den internationalen Forschungsstand.

  • Schmidt, L., & Neuburger, M. (2017). Trapped between privileges and precariousness: Tracing transdisciplinary research in a postcolonial setting. Futures, 93, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.07.005

  • Schmidt, L., & Pröpper, M. (2017). Transdisciplinarity as a real-world challenge: A case study on a North–South collaboratio. Sustainability Science, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0430-8

  • Schmutzer, M. E. A. (2017). Um-Wege zur Un-Wahrheit. Von Technikeuphorie über Wissenschaftsskepsis zur Kunst. transcript Verlag. http://www.transcript-verlag.de/978-3-8376-4123-3/Um-Wege-zur-Un-Wahrheit

  • Scholz, R. (2017). The Normative Dimension in Transdisciplinarity, Transition Management, and Transformation Sciences: New Roles of Science and Universities in Sustainable Transitioning. Sustainability, 9(6), 991.

  • Scholz, R. W. (2017). Managing complexity: From visual perception to sustainable transitions—Contributions of Brunswik’s Theory of Probabilistic Functionalism. Environment Systems and Decisions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-017-9655-4

  • Scholz, R. W., Yarime, M., & Shiroyama, H. (2017). Global leadership for social design: Theoretical and educational perspectives. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0454-0

  • Schuck-Zöller, S., Cortekar, J., & Jacob, D. (2017). Evaluating co-creation of knowledge: From quality criteria and indicators to methods. Advances in Science and Research, 14, 305–312.

  • Sciences, S. A. of A. and. (2017). A Conflict Sensitive Approach to Field Research – Doing Any Better? In Swiss Academies Reports (Vol. 12, Issue 5). Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. https://naturwissenschaften.ch/organisations/kfpe/95494-a-conflict-sensitive-approach-to-field-research---doing-any-better-

  • Sieveking, A., Weber, H., Riewerts, B., & Böhme, M. (2017). Towards a Sustainable Use of Phosphorus: A Transdisciplinary Scenario Analysis for the Administrative District of Lüneburg, Germany. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.9

  • Stokols, D. (2017). Social Ecology in the Digital Age. Solving Complex Problems in a Globalized World. Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/social-ecology-in-the-digital-age/stokols/978-0-12-803113-1

  • Sugiyama, M., Deguchi, H., Ema, A., Kishimoto, A., Mori, J., Shiroyama, H., & Scholz, R. (2017). Unintended Side Effects of Digital Transition: Perspectives of Japanese Experts. Sustainability, 9(12), 2193.

  • Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences (ed). (2017). A Conflict Sensitive Approach to Field Research Doing Any Better? 12(5). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.848501

  • Szostak, R. (2017). Stability, Instability, and Interdisciplinarity. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 65–87.

  • Ukowitz, M. (2017a). Rezension zu ‘Defila R, Di Giulio A (eds) 2016. Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. TATuP, 26(1–2), 76–78.

  • Ukowitz, M. (2017b). Transdisziplinäre Forschung in Reallaboren: Ein Plädoyer für Einheit in der Vielfalt. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.4

  • Vilsmaier, U. (2017). A Space for Taking a Culturally Sensitive Look at Transdisciplinarity: Report of the ITD Conference 2017. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(4), 352–354. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.13

  • Wall, T. U., Meadow, A. M., & Horganic, A. (2017). Developing Evaluation Indicators to Improve the Process of Coproducing Usable Climate Science. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-16-0008.1

  • Wellman, B., Dimitrova, D., Hayat, T., Ying Mo, G., & Wellman, B. (2017). Fifteen Implications of Networked Scholar Research for Networked Work. International Journal of Communication, 11, 2062–2066.

  • West, C., Marquardt, E., & Gerhard, U. (2017). Co-design und co-production von Wissen für die nachhaltige Stadt: Das Reallabor Urban Office in Heidelberg. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.1.13

  • Wilhelm, R., & Schulz, T. (2017). Nachhaltige Entwicklung braucht soziale Innovationen – die Sozial-ökologische Forschung als Wegbereiter. In M. Jaeger-Erben, J. Rückert-John, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Soziale Innovationen für nachhaltigen Konsum: Wissenschaftliche Perspektiven, Strategien der Förderung und gelebte Praxis. Springer Fachmedien. https://www.springerprofessional.de/nachhaltige-entwicklung-braucht-soziale-innovationen-die-sozial-/11971068

  • Wine, O., Ambrose, S., Campbell, S., Villeneuve, P. J., Burns, K. K., & Vargas, A. O. (2017). Key Components of Collaborative Research in the Context of Environmental Health: A Scoping Review. Journal of Research Practice, 13(2). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/577/477

  • Zaehringer, J. G., Schwilch, G., Andriamihaja, O. R., Ramamonjisoa, B., & Messerli, P. (2017). Remote sensing combined with social-ecological data: The importance of diverse land uses for ecosystem service provision in north-eastern Madagascar. Ecosystem Services, 25, 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.004

  • Zscheischler, J., Rogga, S., & Busse, M. (2017). The Adoption and Implementation of Transdisciplinary Research in the Field of Land-Use Science—A Comparative Case Study. Sustainability, 9(11), 1926.

  • Adame, D., & Panico, F. (2016). Reaprendizaje transdisciplinario. Hacia una nueva manera de conocer. Universidad Veracruzana.

  • AG, econcept. (2016). Erfolgsfaktoren für die Zusammenarbeit von Wissenschaft und Zivilgesellschaft. http://www.stiftung-mercator.ch/de/aktuelles/erfolgsfaktoren-fuer-die-zusammenarbeit-von-wissenschaft-und-zivilgesellschaft/

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. (2016a). Auf der Suche nach dem Ganzen in der Medizin—Der Beitrag der Philosophie: Bericht zum Workshop Medical Humanities IV.

  • Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. (2016b). Brennpunkt Klima Schweiz. Grundlagen, Folgen und Perspektiven. In Swiss Academies Reports (Vol. 11, Issue 5). Akademien der Wissenschaften Schweiz. http://www.naturwissenschaften.ch/organisations/proclim/activities/brennpunkt/downloads/81637-brennpunkt-klima-schweiz

  • Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2016). Time and the Rhythms of Emancipatory Education. Rethinking the temporal complexity of self and society. Routledge. https://books.google.ch/books?id=JXZjDQAAQBAJ

  • Bammer, G. (2016a). Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity – Toolkit #3. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.3

  • Bammer, G. (2016b). Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity – Toolkit #4. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.2

  • Bammer, G. (2016c). Toolkits for Transdisciplinarity – Toolkit #5. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.2

  • Bammer, G. (2016d). Toolkits for transdisciplinarity – Toolkit #6. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 229. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.2

  • Barela, S. J. (2016). The New US Anti-Torture Law: A Genuine Step Forward.

  • Barth, M., Michelsen, G., Rieckmann, M., & Thomas, I. (2016). Routledge Handbook of Higher Education for Sustainable Development. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/products/9780415727303

  • Becker, E. (2016). Keine Gesellschaft ohne Natur. Beiträge zur Entwicklung einer Sozialen Ökologie. Campus Verlag. http://www.campus.de/buecher-campus-verlag/wissenschaft/soziologie/keine_gesellschaft_ohne_natur-10274.html

  • Belcher, B. M., Rasmussen, K. E., Kemshaw, M. R., & Zornes, D. A. (2016). Defining and assessing research quality in a transdisciplinary context. Research Evaluation, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv025

  • Belcher, Brian M. et al 2016_tab 3. Et al 2016_tab 3. Et al 2016_tab 3. Et al 2016_tab 3. Et al 2016_tab 3. (n.d.).

  • Benessia, A., Funtowicz, S., Giampietro, M., Guimaraes Pereira, A., Ravetz, J. R., Saltelli, A., Strand, R., & Jeroen, van der S. (2016). The Rightful Place of Science: Science on the Verge. In The Rightful Place of Science. Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Arizona State University. http://cspo.org/publication/the-rightful-place-of-science-science-on-the-verge/

  • Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Lux, A., Nagy, E., & Schäfer, M. (2016). Wirkungsvolle transdisziplinäre Forschung: TransImpact untersucht transdisziplinäre Projekte. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 59–60. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.13

  • Bernert, P., Haaser, A., Kühl, L., & Schaal, T. (2016). Towards a Real-world Laboratory: A Transdisciplinary Case Study from Lüneburg. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.7

  • Beute Hochschule für Technik Berlin (Hrsg.). (2017). Research Day 2016: Stadt der Zukunft. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. https://www.bwv-verlag.de/shop/bwv/apply/viewdetail/id/5678/

  • Bittner, A., Pyhel, T., & Bischoff, V. (2016). Nachhaltigkeit erfahren. Engagement als Schlüssel einer Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/nachhaltigkeit-erfahren.html

  • Blättel-Mink, B. (2017). Rezension zu ‘R. Defila und A. Di Giulio (eds) (2016): Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. Köln Z Soziol, 69(3), 537–540.

  • Böcher, M., & Krott, M. (2016). Science Makes the World Go Round. Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer for the Environment. Springer. http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319340777

  • Boix Mansilla, V., Lamont, M., & Sato, K. (2016). Shared Cognitive–Emotional–Interactional Platforms. Markers and Conditions for Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(4), 571–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915614103

  • Bonn, A. (2016). Grünbuch Citizen Science Strategie 2020 für Deutschland. BürGEr schaffen WISSen – Wissen schafft Bürger (GEWISS).

  • Brand, U. (2016). ‘Transformation’  as a new critical orthodoxy: The strategic use of the term ‘Transformation’ does not prevent multiple crises. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.7

  • Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v534/n7609/abs/nature18315.html#supplementary-information

  • Burger, K. (2016). A transdisciplinary approach to research on early childhood education. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 197–200. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.13

  • Caruso, E., Schunko, C., Corbera, E., Ruiz Mallén, I., Vogl, C. R., Martin, G., Arrázola, S., Pedro Bandeira, F., Calvo Boyero, D., Camacho Benavides, C., Mota Cardoso, T., Chan-Dzul, A., Conde, E., del Campo García, C., Huanca, T., Laranjeiras Sampaio, J. A., Oliveros Lopez, S., Porter-Bolland, L., & Ruiz Betancourt, O. (2016). Lessons for Research Policy and Practice: The Case of Co-enquiry Research With Rural Communities. Journal of Research Practice, 12(1). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/504/450

  • Caviola, H., Kläy, A., & Weiss, H. (2016). Im physikalischen Verdichtungslabor: Wie Sprache das Denken und Handeln im Siedlungsbau beeinflusst. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.11

  • Dankel, D. J., Stange, K., & Nielsen, K. N. (2016). What hat are you wearing? On the multiple roles of fishery scientists in the ICES community. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv199

  • Darbellay, F., Sedooka, A., & Paulsen, T. (2016). La recherche interdisciplinaire sous la loupe. Paroles de chercheurs. Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/46448?rskey=Y4j5en&result=4

  • de Jong, S. P. L., Wardenaar, T., & Horlings, E. (2016). Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes. Research Policy, 45(7), 1397–1409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.008

  • Defila, R., & Di Giulio, A. (2016). Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen. Campus Verlag. http://www.campus.de/buecher-campus-verlag/wissenschaft/soziologie/transdisziplinaer_forschen_zwischen_ideal_und_gelebter_praxis-10275.html

  • Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., & Schäfer, M. (2016). Hotspots der transdisziplinären Kooperation – Ausgangslagen von besonderer Bedeutung. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 27–89). Campus Verlag. http://www.campus.de/buecher-campus-verlag/wissenschaft/soziologie/transdisziplinaer_forschen_zwischen_ideal_und_gelebter_praxis-10275.html

  • Defila, R. (Hg. ), & Di Giulio, A. (Hg. ). (2016). Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis: Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (R. Defila & A. Di Giulio, Eds.).

  • Di Giulio, A., Defila, R., & Brückmann, Th. (2016). ‘Das ist halt das eine ... Praxis, das andere ist Theorie’ – Prinzipien transdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit im Forschungsalltag. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 189–286). Campus Verlag.

  • Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R., Rossignoli, C. M., & Scarpellini, P. (2016). Measuring the effects of transdisciplinary research: The case of a social farming project. Futures, 75, 24–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.10.009

  • Drexler, C., Braun, V., Christie, D., Claramunt, B., Dax, T., Jelen, I., Kanka, R., Katsoulakos, N., Le Roux, G., Price, M., Scheurer, T., & R., W. (2016). Mountains for Europe‘s Future – A strategic research agenda An input to the Horizon 2020 Work Programmes and Calls 2018–2020 April 2016.

  • Ejderyan, O., Carabias-Hütter, V., Kläy, A., & Moschitz, H. (2016). Stakeholder Dialogue for Sustainability: The Challenge of Thinking between Boxes. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 299–301. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.17

  • Europe, S. (2016). Career Pathways in Multidisciplinary Research: How to Assess the Contributions of Single Authors in Large Teams. Workshop organized by the Science Europe Scientific Committee for Life, Environmental and Geo Sciences.

  • Fam, D., Palmer, J., Riedy, C., & Mitchell, C. (2016). Transdisciplinary Research and Practice for Sustainability Outcomes. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Transdisciplinary-Research-and-Practice-for-Sustainability-Outcomes/Fam-Palmer-Mitchell-Riedy/p/book/9781138119703

  • Felege, C., Hahn, E., Hunter, C., & Gleditsch, R. (2016). Bench, Bedside, Curbside, and Home: Translational Research to Include Transformative Change Using Educational Research. Journal of Research Practice, 12(2). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/548/453

  • Fjelland, R. (2016). When Laypeople are Right and Experts are Wrong: Lessons from Love Canal. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 22(1), 105–125.

  • Gaziulusoy, A. I., Ryan, C., McGrail, S., Chandler, P., & Twomey, P. (2016). Identifying and addressing challenges faced by transdisciplinary research teams in climate change research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.049

  • Gløersen, E., Mader, C., & Ruoss, E. (2016). What Policy Evidence for a European Strategy of Sustainable Development in Mountain Regions? Journal of Alpine Research | Revue de Géographie Alpine, 104(3), URL : http://rga.revues.org/3330.

  • Goepel, M. (2016). The Great Mindshift. How a New Economic Paradigm and Sustainability Transformations go Hand in Hand. Spriger. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319437651

  • Gölz, S. (2016). Was hat Stromverbrauchsfeedback mit Schwimmen zu tun – Die Erfahrungen aus dem transdisziplinären Forschungsverbund Intelliekon. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 105–143). Campus Verlag. http://www.campus.de/buecher-campus-verlag/wissenschaft/soziologie/transdisziplinaer_forschen_zwischen_ideal_und_gelebter_praxis-10275.html

  • Grunwald, A. (2016). Nachhaltigkeit verstehen. Arbeiten an der Bedeutung nachhaltiger Entwicklung. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/nachhaltigkeit-verstehen.html

  • Grunwald, A., Renn, O., & Schippl, J. (2016). Fünf Jahre integrative Forschung zur Energiewende: Erfahrungen und Einsichten. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 302–304. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.18

  • Haber, W., Held, M., & Vogt, M. (2016). Die Welt im Anthropozän. Erkundungen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Ökologie und Humanität. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/vorschau/buch/die-welt-im-anthropozaen.html

  • Heinrichs, H., Martens, P., Michelsen, G., & Wiek, A. (2016). Sustainability Science—An Introduction. Springer. http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-7242-6

  • Helming, K., Ferretti, J., Daedlow, K., Podhora, A., Kopfmüller, J., Winkelmann, M., Bertling, J., & Walz, R. (2016). Forschen für nachhaltige Entwicklung: Kriterien für gesellschaftlich verantwortliche Forschungsprozesse. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.6

  • Herweg, K., Zimmerman, A. B., Lundsgaard Hansen, L., Tribelhorn, T., Hammer, T., Tanner, R. P., Trechsel, L., Bieri, S., & Kläy, A. (2016). Nachhaltige Entwicklung in die Hochschullehre integrieren – Ein Leitfaden mit Vertiefungen für die Universität Bern. Universität Bern, Vizerektorat Qualität, Vizerektorat Lehre, Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), Bereich Hoschuldidaktik & Lehrentwicklung, und Bern Open Publishing (BOP). http://www.cde.unibe.ch/forschung/bne/projekte/nachhaltige_entwicklung_in_die_lehre_integrieren/index_ger.html

  • Hoffmann, S. (2016). Transdisciplinary knowledge integration within large research programs. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 201–203. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.14

  • Hubert, B., & Mathieu, N. (2016). Interdisciplinarités entre Natures et Sociétés. Colloque de Cerisy. Peter Lang.

  • Huutoniemi, K., & Tapio, P. (2016). Transdisciplinary Sustainability Studies. A Heuristic Approach. Routledge.

  • Institut für Landschaft und Freiraum (Hrsg.) / Siegrist  Ursina (Redaktion), D. (Redaktion) / L. (2016). Landschaftsqualität im urbanen und periurbanen Raum. Haupt Verlag. http://www.haupt.ch/Verlag/Buecher/Natur/Umwelt-Oekologie/Landschaftsqualitaet-im-urbanen-und-periurbanen-Raum.html?listtype=search&searchparam=periurban

  • Jahn, T., & Keil, F. (2016). Reallabore im Kontext transdisziplinärer Forschung. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.6

  • Kaufmann-Hayoz, R., Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., & Winkelmann, M. (2016). Was man sich erhoffen darf – Zur gesellschaftlichen Wirkung transdisziplinärer Forschung. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 289–327). Campus Verlag.

  • Keller, R. (2016). Ökosystemleistungen in der Schweiz. Chancen, Risiken und Nebenwirkungen bei der praktischen Anwendung. Haupt Verlag. http://www.haupt.ch/index.php?cl=details&anid=9783258080062

  • Kirchhoff, T., & Köchy, K. (2016). Wünschenswerte Vielheit. Diversität als Kategorie, Befund und Norm. In Lebenswissenschaften im Dialog (Issue 21). Verlag Karl Alber. http://www.verlag-alber.de/suche/details_html?k_tnr=48758

  • Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A., & Schneider, F. (2016). Statt Eingreifen wider Willen – reflexiv transformative Wissenschaft. Bulletin Der Vereinigung Der Schweizerischen Hochschuldozierenden, 42(3/4), 46–52.

  • Kopatz, M. (2016). Ökoroutine. Damit wir tun, was wir für richtig halten. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/oekoroutine.html

  • Krainer, L. (2016). Rezension zu ‘Defila R, Di Giulio A (eds) 2016. Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. Forschung (Politik - Strategie - Management), 2, 54–55.

  • Krainer, L., & Lerchster, R. (2016). Interventionsforschung: Anliegen, Potentiale und Grenzen transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft—Eine Einführung. In R. Lerchster & L. Krainer (Eds.), Interventionsforschung. Band 2: Anliegen, Potentiale und Grenzen transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft (pp. 1–7). Springer.

  • Krainer, L., & Winiwarter, V. (2016). Die Universität als Akteurin der transformativen Wissenschaft. Konsequenzen für die Messung der Qualität transdisziplinärer Forschung. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.11

  • Krueger, T., Maynard, C., Carr, G., Bruns, A., Mueller, E. N., & Lane, S. (2016). A transdisciplinary account of water research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, . doi:10.1002/wat2.1132. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1132

  • Lange, H. (2016). Rezension zu Defila und Di Giulio ‘Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 235–240). Campus.

  • Lange, H., & Fuest, V. (2016). OPTIONEN zur Stärkung inter- und transdisziplinärer Verbundforschung Eine empirische Studie. Artec-Paper, 201.

  • Lawrence, R. J. (2016). Interdisciplinary Science: A Coming of Age?

  • Lentzen, L., Stablo, J., & Ruppert-Winkel, C. (2016). Handlungsfelder von Stadt-Umland-Kooperationen für eine Energieversorgung mit erneuerbaren Energien. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.9

  • Lerchster, R., & Krainer, L. (2016). Interventionsforschung. Band 2: Anliegen, Potentiale und Grenzen transdisziplinärer Wissenschaft. Springer.

  • LERU. (2016). Interdisciplinarity: How universities unlock its power to innovate.

  • LIRA 2030 Africa: Key achievements and learnings (2016-2021). (2023). https://doi.org/10.24948/2023.04

  • Mathez-Stiefel, S.-L., Ayquipa-Valenzuela, J., Corrales-Quispe, R., Rosales-Richard, L., & Valdivia-Díaz, M. (2016). Identifying Gender-Sensitive Agroforestry Options: Methodological Considerations From the Field. Mountain Research and Development, 36(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-16-00051.1

  • McCarty, W. (2016). Becoming Interdisciplinary. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A New Companion to Digital Humanities. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch5

  • McLeish, T., & Strang, V. (2016). Evaluating interdisciplinary research: The elephant in the peer-reviewers’ room. Palgrave Communications, 2. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.55

  • Menken, S., & Keestra, M. (2016). An Introduction to Interdisciplinary Research: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam University Press. http://en.aup.nl/books/9789462981843-an-introduction-to-interdisciplinary-research.html

  • Morris, S., Macleod, C. (Kit) J. A., Bammer, G., Meagher, L., Gordon, I., Hartley, S., Lyall, C., Prager, K., Stringer, L. C., & Tibbett, M. (2016). Working Together for Better Outcomes.

  • Muller, A., & Huppenbauer, M. (2016). Sufficiency, Liberal Societies and Environmental Policy in the Face of Planetary Boundaries. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(2), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.10

  • Nascimento, S., & Pólvora, A. (2016). Social sciences in the transdisciplinary making of sustainable artifacts. Social Science Information, 55(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018415609173

  • Nemnich, C., & Fischer, D. (2016). Praxis essen Wissenschaft auf? Von den Gefahren des Gelingens einer transdisziplinären Zusammenarbeit. In R. Defila & A. Di Giulio (Eds.), Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen (pp. 145–187). Campus Verlag. http://www.campus.de/buecher-campus-verlag/wissenschaft/soziologie/transdisziplinaer_forschen_zwischen_ideal_und_gelebter_praxis-10275.html

  • Nicolescu, B. (2016). The Hidden Third. Quantum Prose.

  • Ormerod, R. J. (2016). Critical rationalism for practice and its relationship to critical systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2326

  • O’Rourke, M., Crowley, S., & Gonnerman, C. (2016). On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003

  • Ott, C., & Kiteme, B. (2016). Concepts and practices for the democratisation of knowledge generation in research partnerships for sustainable development. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 12(3), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14700793045951

  • Parodi, O., Albiez, M., Beecroft, R., Meyer-Soylu, S., Quint, A., Seebacher, A., Trenks, H., & Waitz, C. (2016). Das Konzept ,,Reallabor” schärfen: Ein Zwischenruf des Reallabor 131: KIT findet Stadt. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 284–285. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.11

  • Reisch, L. A., Cohen, M. J., Thøgersen, J. B., & Tukker, A. (2016). Frontiers in Sustainable Consumption Research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.4.4

  • Repko, A. F., Szostak, R., & Phillips Buchberger, M. (2016). Introduction to Interdisciplinary Studies. Sage.

  • Repko, A., & Szostak, R. (2016). Interdisciplinary Research. Process and Theory. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/interdisciplinary-research/book246131

  • Rey, E., & Lufkin, S. (2016). GREEN DENSITY: A transdisciplinary research and teaching project for the design of sustainable neighbourhoods. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.10

  • Rhodius, R., Bachinger, M., Pregernig, M., & Koch, B. (2016). Co-design und co-production im Reallabor Wissensdialog Nordschwarzwald. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(2), 131–132. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.15

  • Rowland, S. (2016). Remembering Dionysus: Revisioning Psychology and Literature in C.G. Jung and James Hillman. Routledge. https://books.google.ch/books?id=r5QSswEACAAJ

  • Saric, J., Utzinger, J., & Bonfoh, B. (2018). Research productivity and main publishing institutions in Côte d’Ivoire, 2000–2016. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0406-1

  • Schmuck, P. (2016). Rezension des Buches ‘Transdisziplinär forschen—Zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’ von Rico Defila und Antonietta Di Giulio (Hrsg.) (2016). Umweltpsychologie, 20(1), 151–154.

  • Schneider, F., Bonriposi, M., Graefe, O., Herweg, K., Homewood, C., Huss, M., Kauzlaric, M., Liniger, H., Rey, E., Reynard, E., Rist, S., Schädler, B., & Weingartner, R. (2016). MontanAqua: Tackling water stress in the alps: Water management options in the Crans-Montana-Sierre region (Valais). GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.11

  • Schneidewind, U., & Augenstein, K. (2016). Three schools of transformation thinking: The impact of ideas, institutions, and technological innovation on transformation processes. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.2.7

  • Schweizer, S., Stavrou, V., van Breda, J., & Adler, C. (2016). Transdisciplinary Training Program: Reflections and Recommendations from the national and regional workshops, Stellenbosch, March 2016.

  • Sedooka, A., Steffen, G., Paulsen, T., & Darbellay, F. (2016). Paradoxe identitaire et interdisciplinarité: Un regard sur les identités disciplinaires des chercheurs. Natures Sciences Sociétés. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015056

  • Siew, T. F., Aenis, T., Spangenberg, J. H., Nauditt, A., Döll, P., Frank, S. K., Ribbe, L., Rodriguez-Labajos, B., Rumbaur, C., Settele, J., & Wang, J. (2016). Transdisciplinary research in support of land and water management in China and Southeast Asia: Evaluation of four research projects. Sustainability Science, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0378-0

  • Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. (2016). Switzerland and the Commodities Trade – Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. In Swiss Academies Factsheets (Vols V11, I1). Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences.

  • Sword-Daniels, V., Eriksen, C., Hudson-Doyle, E. E., Alaniz, R., Adler, C., Schenk, T., & Vallance, S. (2016). Embodied uncertainty: Living with complexity and natural hazards. Journal of Risk Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1200659

  • Szostak, R. (2016). Interdisciplinary Best Practices for Adapted Physical Activity. Quest, 68(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2015.1117001

  • Szostak, R., Gnoli, C., & López-Huertas, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary Knowledge Organization. Springer. http://www.springer.com/fr/book/9783319301471

  • Tanner, M. (2016). A harmonic way to transdisciplinarity: Experience from global health development. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 204–206. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.15

  • Tempelhoff, J. (2016). Exploring panarchy and social-ecological resilience: Towards understanding water history in precolonial Southern Africa. Historia, 61, 92–112.

  • Tobias, S., Ströbele, M., Nobis, M., Obrist, M., Moretti, M., Hunziker, M., Hersperger, A., Pütz, M., Kienast, F., & Buser Abb, T. (2016). Merkblatt für die Praxis Siedlungs-und Landschaftsentwicklung in agglomerationsnahen Räumen Raumansprüche von Mensch und Natur. www.wsl.ch/publikationen

  • Tobias, S., Ströbele, M., Nobis, M., Obrist, M., Moretti, M., Hunziker, M., Hersperger, A., Pütz, M., Kienast, F., & Buser, T. (2016). Siedlungs- und Landschaftsentwicklung in agglomerationsnahen Räumen. Raumansprüche von Mensch und Natur. Merkblatt Für Die Praxis, 56, 16.

  • Udert, K. M., Etter, B., & Gounden, T. (2016). Promoting sanitation in South Africa through nutrient recovery from urine. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 194–196. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.12

  • Ukowitz, M. (2017). Rezension zu ‘Defila R, Di Giulio A (eds) 2016. Transdisziplinär forschen – zwischen Ideal und gelebter Praxis. Hotspots, Geschichten, Wirkungen’. TATuP, 26(1–2), 76–78.

  • Vukotich, C. J. Jr. (2016). Challenges of T3 and T4 Translational Research. Journal of Research Practice, 12(2). http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/552/454

  • Wernli, D., Tanner, M., Kickbusch, I., Escher, G., Paccaud, F., & Flahault, A. (2016). Moving global health forward in academic institutions. Journal of Global Health, 6(1), 10409. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.06.010409

  • Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen. (2016). Der urbane Planet wie Städte unsere Zukunft sichern.

  • Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen WBGU, B. (2016). Der Umzug der Menschheit: Die transformative Kraft der Städte. http://www.wbgu.de/hg2016/

  • Wuelser, G., & Pohl, C. (2016a). How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: A typology based on grounded theory. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0363-7

  • Wuelser, G., & Pohl, C. (2016b). How researchers frame scientific contributions to sustainable development: A typology based on grounded theory. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-016-0363-7/TABLES/3

  • Wülser, G. (2016). Buchbesprechung: Forschung für Nachhaltigkeit an deutschen Hochschulen, Walter Leal Filho (Hrsg.). BIOspektrum, 22(7), 775.

  • Wuppertal Institut (Hrsg.). (2016). Wissen als transformative Energie. Zur Verknüpfung von Modellen und Experimenten in der Gebäude-Energiewende. oekom verlag. https://www.oekom.de/nc/buecher/gesamtprogramm/buch/wissen-als-transformative-energie.html

  • Wyss, V. (2016). Medienwissenschaftliche Eingriffe in der Transdisziplinarität. VSH-Bulletin, 3/4, 43–60.

  • Zaehringer, J. G., Hett, C., Ramamonjisoa, B., & Messerli, P. (2016). Beyond deforestation monitoring in conservation hotspots: Analysing landscape mosaic dynamics in north-eastern Madagascar. Applied Geography, 68, 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.12.009

  • Zemmin, F., Jager, C., & Vanheeswijck, G. (2016). Working with A Secular Age. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Charles Taylor’s Master Narrative. De Gruyter. http://www.degruyter.com/view/product/432171

  • Zinsstag, J., Perrig-Chiello, P., Paulsen, T., & Truffer, B. (2016). Exemplary transdisciplinary projects  – swiss-academies award for transdisciplinary research 2015. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25(3), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.3.9

Contact

td-net

House of Academies
Laupenstrasse 7
P.O. Box
3001 Bern

+41 (0)31 306 93 60 td-net@scnat.ch

Stay informed

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact us directly

Team